I am currently re factoring one of my web applications and I was hoping for some advice on improving my security.
I\'ll note that the application is in ASP.net and t
why not only store the hash in the cookie, or any other pseudorandom number? Then check against the database to get the user ID.
Other things: Make the cookie http only, ie cannot be set with javascript If it is an option, make it only be transmitted with https data
The way most web sites do it is to authenticate the use and if successful they send the browser a cookie to store and send in any subsequent requests. If an attacker were able to get hold of the token (before it expired) they will be able to impersonate the user.
Because of this the cookie and authentication process should always be carried out over a https session. The only realsitic way an attacker has to get hold of the cookie then is to intercept it on the end user's computer and if they are able to do that they can probably install a key stroke logger and get the user's password anyway.
As to what kind of token to use it doesn't matter so long as it's pseudo-random enough to make it computationally expensive for an attacker to guess. I myself use GUIDs. if you need extra information in the cookie apart from just a sessionid you could append a GUID to it and then probably hash or encrypt it just for a belt and braces approach.
The best way is to store a session ID as the cookie value.
Whenever user logs in, you create a record in database or some other session store with a random session ID. Put the ID in a cookie. When you see the cookie later, you can retrieve all user information from database.
This approach has following advantages,
If this doesn't work for you, try encryption. Hash would be my last choice. Hash itself is useless. You have to store user id and other information in a different cookie in clear. You ended up expose user information.
Two ways:
This is good because it lets you decrypt it; but it may be argued that you don't need to decrypt it (depending on what else you store in there).
I'd probably (and have previously) go with option #1.