No changes detected in Alembic autogeneration of migrations with Flask-SQLAlchemy

后端 未结 5 1877
有刺的猬
有刺的猬 2020-12-24 02:35

I\'m having trouble getting Alembic to autogenerate candidate migrations from changes to classes using db.Model (Flask-SQLAlchemy) instead of Base.

相关标签:
5条回答
  • 2020-12-24 03:10

    My mistake was to try creating my initial migration with the db already in the final state, thinking it would notice it had no existing versions and base it on the models. I got empty versions until I deleted all tables in the db and then it worked fine.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-24 03:21

    I also faced this issue and using this way to solve that:

    open the migrations/env.py file, and on def run_migrations_online() function look at the context.configure, on Alembic 1.0.8 it should look like this:

    with connectable.connect() as connection:
        context.configure(
            connection=connection,
            target_metadata=target_metadata,
            process_revision_directives=process_revision_directives,
            **current_app.extensions['migrate'].configure_args,
        )
    

    Just remove or comment theprocess_revision_directives=process_revision_directives and then add the compare_type=True on that.

    Like this:

    with connectable.connect() as connection:
        context.configure(
            connection=connection,
            target_metadata=target_metadata,
            # process_revision_directives=process_revision_directives,
            **current_app.extensions['migrate'].configure_args,
            compare_type=True
        )
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-24 03:22

    Try flask-alembic https://github.com/tobiasandtobias/flask-alembic

    I tried it yesterday. It works fine for me except drop operations. They doesn't work on sqlite (https://bitbucket.org/zzzeek/alembic/issue/21/column-renames-not-supported-on-sqlite).

    The way I've used it. First I used python manage.py migrate revision --autogenerate to create empty tables in sqlite db. It'll produce such migration

    def upgrade():
        ### commands auto generated by Alembic - please adjust! ###
        op.create_table('users_user',
        sa.Column('id', sa.Integer(), nullable=False),
        sa.Column('name', sa.String(length=50), nullable=True),
        sa.Column('email', sa.String(length=120), nullable=True),
        sa.Column('password', sa.String(length=20), nullable=True),
        sa.Column('role', sa.SmallInteger(), nullable=True),
        sa.Column('status', sa.SmallInteger(), nullable=True),
        sa.PrimaryKeyConstraint('id'),
        sa.UniqueConstraint('email'),
        sa.UniqueConstraint('name')
    )
    ### end Alembic commands ###
    
    def downgrade():
        ### commands auto generated by Alembic - please adjust! ###
        op.drop_table('users_user')
        ### end Alembic commands ###
    

    Then - python manage.py migrate upgrade head

    Then I added a new column test = db.Column(db.String(20)) to User model and ran this command python manage.py migrate revision --autogenerate -m 'test field at users'

    This produced such migration:

    def upgrade():
        ### commands auto generated by Alembic - please adjust! ###
        op.add_column('users_user', sa.Column('test', sa.String(length=20), nullable=True))
        ### end Alembic commands ###
    
    
    def downgrade():
        ### commands auto generated by Alembic - please adjust! ###
        op.drop_column('users_user', 'test')
        ### end Alembic commands ###
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-24 03:25

    This may be a silly suggestion, but I was having similar issues. All my env files were pointed to the right places and such, yet I still couldn't generate this new table. I was using the command sequence "alembic revision -m 'comment'" and then "alembic upgrade head" and I got 'empty' revision files.

    Finally after deleting all the migration files, destroying the docker images, reinstating the migration files, re-attempting the above sequence of cli commands and just before manually hand coding the migration, I tried "alembic revision --autogenerate" and it found and created the migrations for the table.

    This may have been due to all the other steps I previously took. My apologies if it isn't very helpful.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-24 03:33

    Alembic cannot automatically detect table or column renames. By default it will not look for column type changes either, but the compare_type option can be enabled for this.

    Excerpt from the Alembic documentation:

    Autogenerate will by default detect:

    • Table additions, removals.
    • Column additions, removals.
    • Change of nullable status on columns.

    Autogenerate can optionally detect:

    • Change of column type. This will occur if you set compare_type=True on EnvironmentContext.configure(). The feature works well in most cases, but is off by default so that it can be tested on the target schema first. It can also be customized by passing a callable here; see the function’s documentation for details.
    • Change of server default. This will occur if you set compare_server_default=True on EnvironmentContext.configure(). This feature works well for simple cases but cannot always produce accurate results. The Postgresql backend will actually invoke the “detected” and “metadata” values against the database to determine equivalence. The feature is off by default so that it can be tested on the target schema first. Like type comparison, it can also be customized by passing a callable; see the function’s documentation for details.

    Autogenerate can not detect:

    • Changes of table name. These will come out as an add/drop of two different tables, and should be hand-edited into a name change instead.
    • Changes of column name. Like table name changes, these are detected as a column add/drop pair, which is not at all the same as a name change.
    • Special SQLAlchemy types such as Enum when generated on a backend which doesn’t support ENUM directly - this because the representation of such a type in the non-supporting database, i.e. a CHAR+CHECK constraint, could be any kind of CHAR+CHECK. For SQLAlchemy to determine that this is actually an ENUM would only be a guess, something that’s generally a bad idea. To implement your own “guessing” function here, use the sqlalchemy.events.DDLEvents.column_reflect() event to alter the SQLAlchemy type passed for certain columns and possibly sqlalchemy.events.DDLEvents.after_parent_attach() to intercept unwanted CHECK constraints.

    Autogenerate can’t currently, but will eventually detect:

    • Free-standing constraint additions, removals, like CHECK, UNIQUE, FOREIGN KEY - these aren’t yet implemented. Right now you’ll get constraints within new tables, PK and FK constraints for the “downgrade” to a previously existing table, and the CHECK constraints generated with a SQLAlchemy “schema” types Boolean, Enum.
    • Index additions, removals - not yet implemented.
    • Sequence additions, removals - not yet implemented.

    UPDATE: some of the items in this last list are supported in the Alembic 0.7.x releases.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题