If I do
nohup cmd1 | cmd2 &
is that the same as
nohup \"cmd1 | cmd2\" &
?
I would like th
As an alternative to nohup
, I recommend
( cmd1 | cmd2 ) > logfile < /dev/null 2>&1 &
By rerouting stdin, stdout, and sterr from the terminal, this achieves much the same effect as nohup with a syntax that I, at least, prefer.
You could start your pipe in a screen
session. Keystroke Ctrl-a and then d will detach the screen session from your terminal. You can then safely exit your terminal; the pipe will continue to run. Use screen -r
to reconnect to the session again.
No, you need to add the nohup to the commands separately.
Something like this is recommended:
nohup sh -c "cmd1 | cmd2" &
Or alternatively:
nohup $SHELL <<EOF &
cmd1 | cmd2
EOF
nohup cmd1 | cmd2 &
No, I have checked just now this is the as follows
nohup: ignoring input and redirecting stderr to stdout
You always can create a script file and run it with nohup:
echo "cmd1 | cmd2" > nohupScript.sh
nohup nohupScript.sh &