My C programming book says that when I want to create a static function, I need to put the static keyword in front of the function definition. It doesn\'t mention a
yes, yes you do need to put static in front of the declaration.
type this into ideone.com
int add();
int main(){
printf("%d",add());
return 0;
}
static int add(){
return 1+1;
}
you get this result: http://ideone.com/VzZCiE
now type this
static int add();
int main(){
printf("%d",add());
return 0;
}
static int add(){
return 1+1;
}
you get this: http://ideone.com/sz8HVR
boooom
No. A function declaration (prototype or even the definition) can omit the keyword static
if it comes after another declaration of the same function with static
.
If there is one static
declaration of a function, its first declaration has to be static
.
It is defined in ISO/IEC 9899:1999, 6.7.1:
If the declaration of a file scope identifier for [...] a function contains the storage-class specifier
static
, the identifier has internal linkage.[...]
For an identifier declared with the storage-class specifier
extern
in a scope in which a prior declaration of that identifier is visible, if the prior declaration specifies internal or external linkage, the linkage of the identifier at the later declaration is the same as the linkage specified at the prior declaration.[...]
If the declaration of an identifier for a function has no storage-class specifier, its linkage is determined exactly as if it were declared with the storage-class specifier
extern
.[...]
If, within a translation unit, the same identifier appears with both internal and external linkage, the behavior is undefined.
So, e.g. this is valid:
static void foo(void);
void foo(void);
static void foo(void) { }
This one too:
static void foo(void) { }
void foo(void);
static void bar(void);
void bar(void) {}
But this code is incorrect:
void foo(void);
static void foo(void) { }
Normally you will and should have the static
in the prototypes too (because they usually come first).