I believe that the C++ standard for std::sort does not guarantee O(n) performance on a list that\'s already sorted. But still, I\'m wondering whether to your knowledge any i
Implementations are free to use any efficient sorting algorithm they want so this is highly implementation dependant
However I have seen a performance comparison of libstdc++
as used on linux and against libc++
the new C++ library developed by Apple/LLVM. Both these libraries are very efficient on sorted or reverse sorted data (much faster than on a random list) with the new library being considerable faster then the old and recognizing many more patterns.
To be certain you should consider doing your own benchmarks.