I\'ve been having issues trying to do this. I can\'t seem to get it right, I want to control each parent + children of that parent. ExpandableListView has been giving me a h
I think your main mistake resides in public View getChildView(...)
:
if (convertView == null)
is actually only reached once and that's when you load the one you marked as first view. So you are inflating the first layout R.layout.description_of_ads_expandable_list
and reusing it for all the other lines in your list.childPosition==1 && groupPosition==0
? Booom! NullPointerException if your data source has one more element for the first group.So first things first; you should fully implement HeterogeneousExpandableList interface if you want to use different layouts for different groups/children of your ExpandableListView.
Then using that interface work on the conditions of which layout should be loaded.
Finally work on the reuse view issue on public View getChildView(...)
.
Since am a nice guy here is a a snippet that should help you (based on the adapter you post) :
public class CommentsExpandableListAdapter extends BaseExpandableListAdapter {
// 4 Child types
private static final int CHILD_TYPE_1 = 0;
private static final int CHILD_TYPE_2 = 1;
private static final int CHILD_TYPE_3 = 2;
private static final int CHILD_TYPE_UNDEFINED = 3;
// 3 Group types
private static final int GROUP_TYPE_1 = 0;
private static final int GROUP_TYPE_2 = 1;
private static final int GROUP_TYPE_3 = 2;
private Activity context;
private Map<String, List<String>> comments_feed_collection;
private List<String> group_list;
public CommentsExpandableListAdapter(Activity context, List<String> group_list,
Map<String, List<String>> comments_feed_collection) {
this.context = context;
this.comments_feed_collection = comments_feed_collection;
this.group_list = group_list;
}
public Object getChild(int groupPosition, int childPosition) {
return comments_feed_collection.get(group_list.get(groupPosition)).get(childPosition);
}
public long getChildId(int groupPosition, int childPosition) {
return childPosition;
}
public View getChildView(final int groupPosition, final int childPosition, boolean isLastChild, View convertView, ViewGroup parent) {
final String incoming_text = (String) getChild(groupPosition, childPosition);
LayoutInflater inflater = context.getLayoutInflater();
int childType = getChildType(groupPosition, childPosition);
// We need to create a new "cell container"
if (convertView == null || convertView.getTag() != childType) {
switch (childType) {
case CHILD_TYPE_1:
convertView = inflater.inflate(R.layout.description_of_ads_expandable_list, null);
convertView.setTag(childType);
break;
case CHILD_TYPE_2:
convertView = inflater.inflate(R.layout.comments_create_comment, null);
convertView.setTag(childType);
break;
case CHILD_TYPE_3:
convertView = inflater.inflate(R.layout.comments_expandable_list_child, null);
convertView.setTag(childType);
break;
case CHILD_TYPE_UNDEFINED:
convertView = inflater.inflate(R.layout.comments_undefined, null);
convertView.setTag(childType);
break;
default:
// Maybe we should implement a default behaviour but it should be ok we know there are 4 child types right?
break;
}
}
// We'll reuse the existing one
else {
// There is nothing to do here really we just need to set the content of view which we do in both cases
}
switch (childType) {
case CHILD_TYPE_1:
TextView description_child = (TextView) convertView.findViewById(R.id.description_of_ads_expandable_list_child_text_view);
description_child.setText(incoming_text);
break;
case CHILD_TYPE_2:
//Define how to render the data on the CHILD_TYPE_2 layout
break;
case CHILD_TYPE_3:
//Define how to render the data on the CHILD_TYPE_3 layout
break;
case CHILD_TYPE_UNDEFINED:
//Define how to render the data on the CHILD_TYPE_UNDEFINED layout
break;
}
return convertView;
}
public int getChildrenCount(int groupPosition) {
String groupName = group_list.get(groupPosition);
List<String> groupContent = comments_feed_collection.get(groupName);
return groupContent.size();
}
public Object getGroup(int groupPosition) {
return group_list.get(groupPosition);
}
public int getGroupCount() {
return group_list.size();
}
public long getGroupId(int groupPosition) {
return groupPosition;
}
public View getGroupView(int groupPosition, boolean isExpanded, View convertView, ViewGroup parent) {
LayoutInflater inflater = context.getLayoutInflater();
final String incoming_text = (String) getGroup(groupPosition);
int groupType = getGroupType(groupPosition);
// We need to create a new "cell container"
if (convertView == null || convertView.getTag() != groupType) {
switch (groupType) {
case GROUP_TYPE_1 :
convertView = inflater.inflate(R.layout.expandable_list_single_item, null);
break;
case GROUP_TYPE_2:
// Am using the same layout cause am lasy and don't wanna create other ones but theses should be different
// or the group type shouldnt exist
convertView = inflater.inflate(R.layout.expandable_list_single_item, null);
break;
case GROUP_TYPE_3:
// Am using the same layout cause am lasy and don't wanna create other ones but theses should be different
// or the group type shouldnt exist
convertView = inflater.inflate(R.layout.expandable_list_single_item, null);
break;
default:
// Maybe we should implement a default behaviour but it should be ok we know there are 3 group types right?
break;
}
}
// We'll reuse the existing one
else {
// There is nothing to do here really we just need to set the content of view which we do in both cases
}
switch (groupType) {
case GROUP_TYPE_1 :
TextView item = (TextView) convertView.findViewById(R.id.expandable_list_single_item_text_view_group);
item.setTypeface(null, Typeface.BOLD);
item.setText(incoming_text);
break;
case GROUP_TYPE_2:
//TODO: Define how to render the data on the GROUPE_TYPE_2 layout
// Since i use the same layout as GROUPE_TYPE_1 i could do the same thing as above but i choose to do nothing
break;
case GROUP_TYPE_3:
//TODO: Define how to render the data on the GROUPE_TYPE_3 layout
// Since i use the same layout as GROUPE_TYPE_1 i could do the same thing as above but i choose to do nothing
break;
default:
// Maybe we should implement a default behaviour but it should be ok we know there are 3 group types right?
break;
}
return convertView;
}
public boolean hasStableIds() {
return true;
}
public boolean isChildSelectable(int groupPosition, int childPosition) {
return false;
}
@Override
public int getChildTypeCount() {
return 4; // I defined 4 child types (CHILD_TYPE_1, CHILD_TYPE_2, CHILD_TYPE_3, CHILD_TYPE_UNDEFINED)
}
@Override
public int getGroupTypeCount() {
return 3; // I defined 3 groups types (GROUP_TYPE_1, GROUP_TYPE_2, GROUP_TYPE_3)
}
@Override
public int getGroupType(int groupPosition) {
switch (groupPosition) {
case 0:
return GROUP_TYPE_1;
case 1:
return GROUP_TYPE_1;
case 2:
return GROUP_TYPE_2;
default:
return GROUP_TYPE_3;
}
}
@Override
public int getChildType(int groupPosition, int childPosition) {
switch (groupPosition) {
case 0:
switch (childPosition) {
case 0:
return CHILD_TYPE_1;
case 1:
return CHILD_TYPE_UNDEFINED;
case 2:
return CHILD_TYPE_UNDEFINED;
}
break;
case 1:
switch (childPosition) {
case 0:
return CHILD_TYPE_2;
case 1:
return CHILD_TYPE_3;
case 2:
return CHILD_TYPE_3;
}
break;
default:
return CHILD_TYPE_UNDEFINED;
}
return CHILD_TYPE_UNDEFINED;
}
}
And this is how it looks like :
Hope this helps, let me know if it does/doesnt.