How to write database-agnostic Play application and perform first-time database initialization?

后端 未结 4 1477
生来不讨喜
生来不讨喜 2020-12-22 17:45

I\'m using Slick with a Play Framework 2.1 and I have some troubles.

Given the following entity...

package models

import scala.slick.driver.Postgres         


        
相关标签:
4条回答
  • 2020-12-22 18:29

    If, like me, you're not using Play! for the project, a solution is provided by Nishruu here

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-22 18:31

    You find an example on how to use the cake pattern / dependency injection to decouple the Slick driver from the database access layer here: https://github.com/slick/slick-examples.

    How to decouple the Slick driver and test application with FakeApplication

    A few days ago I wrote a Slick integration library for play, which moves the driver dependency to the application.conf of the Play project: https://github.com/danieldietrich/slick-integration.

    With the help of this library your example would be implemented as follows:

    1) Add the dependency to project/Build.scala

    "net.danieldietrich" %% "slick-integration" % "1.0-SNAPSHOT"
    

    Add snapshot repository

    resolvers += "Daniel's Repository" at "http://danieldietrich.net/repository/snapshots"
    

    Or local repository, if slick-integration is published locally

    resolvers += Resolver.mavenLocal
    

    2) Add the Slick driver to conf/application.conf

    slick.default.driver=scala.slick.driver.H2Driver
    

    3) Implement app/models/Account.scala

    In the case of slick-integration, it is assumed that you use primary keys of type Long which are auto incremented. The pk name is 'id'. The Table/Mapper implementation has default methods (delete, findAll, findById, insert, update). Your entities have to implement 'withId' which is needed by the 'insert' method.

    package models
    
    import scala.slick.integration._
    
    case class Account(id: Option[Long], email: String, password: String)
        extends Entity[Account] {
      // currently needed by Mapper.create to set the auto generated id
      def withId(id: Long): Account = copy(id = Some(id))
    }
    
    // use cake pattern to 'inject' the Slick driver
    trait AccountComponent extends _Component { self: Profile =>
    
      import profile.simple._
    
      object Accounts extends Mapper[Account]("account") {
        // def id is defined in Mapper
        def email = column[String]("email")
        def password = column[String]("password")
        def * = id.? ~ email ~ password <> (Account, Account.unapply _)
      }
    
    }
    

    4) Implement app/models/DAL.scala

    This is the Data Access Layer (DAL) which is used by the controllers to access the database. Transactions are handled by the Table/Mapper implementation within the corresponding Component.

    package models
    
    import scala.slick.integration.PlayProfile
    import scala.slick.integration._DAL
    import scala.slick.lifted.DDL
    
    import play.api.Play.current
    
    class DAL(dbName: String) extends _DAL with AccountComponent
        /* with FooBarBazComponent */ with PlayProfile {
    
      // trait Profile implementation
      val profile = loadProfile(dbName)
      def db = dbProvider(dbName)
    
      // _DAL.ddl implementation
      lazy val ddl: DDL = Accounts.ddl // ++ FooBarBazs.ddl
    
    }
    
    object DAL extends DAL("default")
    

    5) Implement test/test/AccountSpec.scala

    package test
    
    import models._
    import models.DAL._
    import org.specs2.mutable.Specification
    import play.api.test.FakeApplication
    import play.api.test.Helpers._
    import scala.slick.session.Session
    
    class AccountSpec extends Specification {
    
      def fakeApp[T](block: => T): T =
        running(FakeApplication(additionalConfiguration = inMemoryDatabase() ++
            Map("slick.default.driver" -> "scala.slick.driver.H2Driver",
              "evolutionplugin" -> "disabled"))) {
          try {
            db.withSession { implicit s: Session =>
              try {
                create
                block
              } finally {
                drop
              }
            }
          }
        }
    
      "An Account" should {
        "be creatable" in fakeApp {
          val account = Accounts.insert(Account(None, "user@gmail.com", "Password"))
          val id = account.id
          id mustNotEqual None 
          Accounts.findById(id.get) mustEqual Some(account)
        }
      }
    
    }
    

    How to determine whether or not the database tables already exist

    I cannot give you a sufficient answer to this question...

    ... but perhaps this is not really s.th you want to do. What if you add an attribute to an table, say Account.active? If you want to safe the data currently stored within your tables, then an alter script would do the job. Currently, such an alter script has to be written by hand. The DAL.ddl.createStatements could be used to retrieve the create statements. They should be sorted to be better comparable with previous versions. Then a diff (with previous version) is used to manually create the alter script. Here, evolutions are used to alter the db schema.

    Here's an example on how to generate (the first) evolution:

    object EvolutionGenerator extends App {
    
      import models.DAL
    
      import play.api.test._
      import play.api.test.Helpers._
    
        running(FakeApplication(additionalConfiguration = inMemoryDatabase() ++
            Map("slick.default.driver" -> "scala.slick.driver.PostgresDriver",
              "evolutionplugin" -> "disabled"))) {
    
    
        val evolution = (
          """|# --- !Ups
             |""" + DAL.ddl.createStatements.mkString("\n", ";\n\n", ";\n") +
          """|
             |# --- !Downs
             |""" + DAL.ddl.dropStatements.mkString("\n", ";\n\n", ";\n")).stripMargin
    
        println(evolution)
    
      }
    
    }
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-22 18:32

    I was also trying to address this problem: the ability to switch databases between test and production. The idea of wrapping each table object in a trait was unappealing.

    I am not trying to discuss the pros and cons of the cake pattern here, but I found another solution, for those who are interested.

    Basically, make an object like this:

    package mypackage
    import scala.slick.driver.H2Driver
    import scala.slick.driver.ExtendedProfile
    import scala.slick.driver.PostgresDriver
    
    object MovableDriver {
      val simple = profile.simple
      lazy val profile: ExtendedProfile = {
        sys.env.get("database") match {
          case Some("postgres") => PostgresDriver
          case _ => H2Driver
        }
      }
    }
    

    Obviously, you can do any decision logic you like here. It does not have to be based on system properties.

    Now, instead of:

    import scala.slick.driver.H2Driver.simple._
    

    You can say

    import mypackage.MovableDriver.simple._
    

    UPDATE: A Slick 3.0 Version, courtesy of trent-ahrens:

    package mypackage
    
    import com.typesafe.config.ConfigFactory
    
    import scala.slick.driver.{H2Driver, JdbcDriver, MySQLDriver}
    
    object AgnosticDriver {
      val simple = profile.simple
      lazy val profile: JdbcDriver = {
        sys.env.get("DB_ENVIRONMENT") match {
          case Some(e) => ConfigFactory.load().getString(s"$e.slickDriver") match {
            case "scala.slick.driver.H2Driver" => H2Driver
            case "scala.slick.driver.MySQLDriver" => MySQLDriver
          }
          case _ => H2Driver
        }
      }
    }
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-22 18:34

    The play-slick does exactly the same as what is proposed in the other answers, and it seems to be under the umbrella of Play/Typesafe.

    You just can import import play.api.db.slick.Config.driver.simple._ and it will choose the appropriate driver according to conf/application.conf.

    It also offers some more things like connection pooling, DDL generation...

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题