What are the respective advantages/limitations of Amazon RDS vs. EC2 with MySQL? [closed]

Answer 1

This is a simple question with a very complicated answer!

In short: EC2 will provide maximum performance if you go with a RAID0 EBS. Doing RAID0 EBS requires a pretty significant amount of maintenance overhead, for example:

http://alestic.com/2009/06/ec2-ebs-raid

http://alestic.com/2009/09/ec2-consistent-snapshot

EC2 without RAID0 EBS will provide crappy I/O performance, thus it's not even really an option.

RDS will provide very good (though not maximum) performance out of the box. The management console is fantastic and it's easy to upgrade instances. High availability and read only slaves are a click away. It's REALLY awesome.

Short answer: Go with RDS. Still on the fence? Go with RDS!!! if you enjoy headaches and tuning every last little bit for maximum performance, then you can consider EC2 + EBS RAID 0. Vanilla EC2 is a terrible option for MySQL hosting.

Answer 2

In this post there is an excellent benchmark between:

• Running MySql on a Small EC2 + EBS
• Running MySql on a Small EC2 + EBS + adjusted MySql parameters
• A Small RDS

The benchmark is very good since it is not focused only in ideal conditions (only one thread) but also in more realistic scenarios, with 50 threads hitting the database.