So I need to find the second smallest number within a list of integers using recursion but I cannot for the life of me devise a way to do it. I can do it with to find smalle
Here is a short implementation that doesn't use min()
or sorted()
. It also works when there are duplicate values in the list.
def ss(e):
if len(e)==2 and e[0]<=e[1]:return e[1]
return ss(e[:-1]) if e[0]<=e[-1]>=e[1] else ss([e[-1]]+e[:-1])
print("The selected value was:", ss([5, 4, 3, 2, 1]))
Here is a pure recursive way. You need to return the first smallest and the second smallest element in a tuple and so on.
def smallest(int_list):
if(len(int_list) == 2):
if (int_list[0] >= int_list[1]):
return (int_list[0],int_list[1])
else:
return (int_list[1],int_list[0])
else:
first_smallest,second_smallest = smallest(int_list[1:])
current_elem = int_list[0]
if(second_smallest <= current_elem):
return (second_smallest,current_elem)
else:
if (current_elem<=first_smallest):
return (current_elem,first_smallest)
else:
return (first_smallest,second_smallest)
if __name__ == "__main__":
small = smallest([1,2,3,4])
print small[1]
//output 2
def second_smallest(my_list):
if len(my_list) == 2:
return my_list[0] if my_list[0] > my_list[1] else my_list[1]
else:
sec_least = second_smallest(my_list[1:])
return sec_least if sec_least < my_list[0] else my_list[1]
Simpler example than my comment:
def find_nth_smallest(n, int_list):
smallest = min(int_list)
if n <= 1:
return smallest
int_list = [v for v in int_list if v != smallest]
if int_list:
return max(find_nth_smallest(n - 1, int_list), smallest)
return None
Example:
Python 2.7.8 (default, Oct 20 2014, 15:05:19)
[GCC 4.9.1] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> from kthTerm import find_nth_smallest
>>> import random
>>> random.seed()
>>> int_list = [random.randint(1, 100) for _ in range(20)]
>>> int_list
[68, 50, 6, 36, 98, 15, 81, 36, 13, 71, 76, 77, 69, 75, 79, 53, 26, 25, 18, 62]
>>> find_nth_smallest(2, int_list)
13
>>> sorted(int_list)
[6, 13, 15, 18, 25, 26, 36, 36, 50, 53, 62, 68, 69, 71, 75, 76, 77, 79, 81, 98]
Here's an approach that doesn't blow the stack for large lists. It would be better to manage the search endpoints manually rather than using slicing which introduce copying.
import random
def min2(xs):
if len(xs) < 3: return xs
n = len(xs) // 2
return sorted(min2(xs[:n]) + [xs[n]] + min2(xs[n+1:]))[:2]
tk = range(100000)
random.shuffle(tk)
print min2(tk)
Here:
def r_sort(a_list, ind):
def rf(list_to_be_sorted, list_already_sorted):
li = []
if len(list_to_be_sorted) == 0:
return list_already_sorted
else:
x = min(list_to_be_sorted)
list_to_be_sorted.remove(x)
li.append(x)
return rf(list_to_be_sorted, list_already_sorted + li)
return rf(a_list, [])[ind]
>>> r_sort([1,10,9,5,55,3,2], 1)
2