PL/SQL Trigger gets a mutating table error

前端 未结 2 1430
隐瞒了意图╮
隐瞒了意图╮ 2020-12-22 06:50

My trigger wants to check if a \'new\' manager supervises no more than 5 employees. Manager supervising only 5 people are in BLOCKED_MANAGER table(ssn,numberofemployees).

相关标签:
2条回答
  • 2020-12-22 07:25

    As you have discovered, you cannot select from the same table that a row-level trigger is defined against; it causes a table mutating exception.

    In order to properly create this validation using a trigger a procedure should be created to obtain user-specified locks so the validation can be correctly serialized in a multi-user environment.

    PROCEDURE request_lock
      (p_lockname                     IN     VARCHAR2
      ,p_lockmode                     IN     INTEGER  DEFAULT dbms_lock.x_mode
      ,p_timeout                      IN     INTEGER  DEFAULT 60
      ,p_release_on_commit            IN     BOOLEAN  DEFAULT TRUE
      ,p_expiration_secs              IN     INTEGER  DEFAULT 600)
    IS
      -- dbms_lock.allocate_unique issues implicit commit, so place in its own
      -- transaction so it does not affect the caller
      PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION;
      l_lockhandle                   VARCHAR2(128);
      l_return                       NUMBER;
    BEGIN
      dbms_lock.allocate_unique
        (lockname                       => p_lockname
        ,lockhandle                     => p_lockhandle
        ,expiration_secs                => p_expiration_secs);
      l_return := dbms_lock.request
        (lockhandle                     => l_lockhandle
        ,lockmode                       => p_lockmode
        ,timeout                        => p_timeout
        ,release_on_commit              => p_release_on_commit);
      IF (l_return not in (0,4)) THEN
        raise_application_error(-20001, 'dbms_lock.request Return Value ' || l_return);
      END IF;
      -- Must COMMIT an autonomous transaction
      COMMIT;
    END request_lock;
    

    This procedure can then be used in a compound trigger (assuming at least Oracle 11, this will need to be split into individual triggers in earlier versions)

    CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER too_many_employees
      FOR INSERT OR UPDATE ON employee
      COMPOUND TRIGGER
    
      -- Table to hold identifiers of inserted/updated employee supervisors
      g_superssns sys.odcivarchar2list;
    
    BEFORE STATEMENT 
    IS
    BEGIN
      -- Reset the internal employee supervisor table
      g_superssns := sys.odcivarchar2list();
    END BEFORE STATEMENT; 
    
    AFTER EACH ROW
    IS
    BEGIN
      -- Store the inserted/updated supervisors of employees
      IF (  (   INSERTING
            AND :new.superssn IS NOT NULL)
         OR (   UPDATING
            AND (  :new.superssn  <> :old.superssn
                OR :new.superssn IS NOT NULL AND :old.superssn IS NULL) ) )
      THEN           
        g_superssns.EXTEND;
        g_superssns(g_superssns.LAST) := :new.superssn;
      END IF;
    END AFTER EACH ROW;
    
    AFTER STATEMENT
    IS
      CURSOR csr_supervisors
      IS
        SELECT DISTINCT
               sup.column_value superssn
        FROM TABLE(g_superssns) sup
        ORDER BY sup.column_value;
      CURSOR csr_constraint_violations
        (p_superssn employee.superssn%TYPE)
      IS
        SELECT count(*) employees
        FROM employees
        WHERE pch.superssn = p_superssn
        HAVING count(*) > 5;
      r_constraint_violation csr_constraint_violations%ROWTYPE;
    BEGIN
      -- Check if for any inserted/updated employee there exists more than
      -- 5 employees for the same supervisor. Serialise the constraint for each
      -- superssn so concurrent transactions do not affect each other
      FOR r_supervisor IN csr_supervisors LOOP
        request_lock('TOO_MANY_EMPLOYEES_' || r_supervisor.superssn);
        OPEN csr_constraint_violations(r_supervisor.superssn);
        FETCH csr_constraint_violations INTO r_constraint_violation;
        IF csr_constraint_violations%FOUND THEN
          CLOSE csr_constraint_violations;
          raise_application_error(-20001, 'Supervisor ' || r_supervisor.superssn || ' now has ' || r_constraint_violation.employees || ' employees');
        ELSE
          CLOSE csr_constraint_violations;
        END IF;
      END LOOP;
    END AFTER STATEMENT;
    
    END;
    

    You do not need the blocked_manager table to manage this constraint. This information can be derived from the employee table.

    Or in versions earlier than Oracle 11i:

    CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE employees_trg
    AS
      -- Table to hold identifiers of inserted/updated employee supervisors
      g_superssns sys.odcivarchar2list;
    END employees_trg;
    
    CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER employee_biu
      BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE ON employee
    IS
    BEGIN
      -- Reset the internal employee supervisor table
      employees_trg.g_superssns := sys.odcivarchar2list();
    END; 
    
    CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER employee_aiur
      AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE ON employee
      FOR EACH ROW
    IS
    BEGIN
      -- Store the inserted/updated supervisors of employees
      IF (  (   INSERTING
            AND :new.superssn IS NOT NULL)
         OR (   UPDATING
            AND (  :new.superssn  <> :old.superssn
                OR :new.superssn IS NOT NULL AND :old.superssn IS NULL) ) )
      THEN           
        employees_trg.g_superssns.EXTEND;
        employees_trg.g_superssns(employees_trg.g_superssns.LAST) := :new.superssn;
      END IF;
    END; 
    
    CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER employee_aiu
      AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE ON employee
    IS
    DECLARE
      CURSOR csr_supervisors
      IS
        SELECT DISTINCT
               sup.column_value superssn
        FROM TABLE(employees_trg.g_superssns) sup
        ORDER BY sup.column_value;
      CURSOR csr_constraint_violations
        (p_superssn employee.superssn%TYPE)
      IS
        SELECT count(*) employees
        FROM employees
        WHERE pch.superssn = p_superssn
        HAVING count(*) > 5;
      r_constraint_violation csr_constraint_violations%ROWTYPE;
    BEGIN
      -- Check if for any inserted/updated employee there exists more than
      -- 5 employees for the same supervisor. Serialise the constraint for each
      -- superssn so concurrent transactions do not affect each other
      FOR r_supervisor IN csr_supervisors LOOP
        request_lock('TOO_MANY_EMPLOYEES_' || r_supervisor.superssn);
        OPEN csr_constraint_violations(r_supervisor.superssn);
        FETCH csr_constraint_violations INTO r_constraint_violation;
        IF csr_constraint_violations%FOUND THEN
          CLOSE csr_constraint_violations;
          raise_application_error(-20001, 'Supervisor ' || r_supervisor.superssn || ' now has ' || r_constraint_violation.employees || ' employees');
        ELSE
          CLOSE csr_constraint_violations;
        END IF;
      END LOOP;
    END;
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-22 07:29

    Probably the quickest way around this is to use a carefully constructed statement trigger instead of a row trigger. Row triggers have the phrase FOR EACH ROW in them, are invoked for each row which is modified (based on the BEFORE/AFTER INSERT, BEFORE/AFTER UPDATE, and BEFORE/AFTER DELETE constraints on the trigger), can see the appropriate :NEW and :OLD values, and are subject to the "can't look at the table on which the trigger is defined" rule. Statement triggers are invoked at the appropriate time for each statement which is executed, can't see row values, but aren't subject to the limits on looking at the particular table on which they're defined. So for the portions of your logic which don't need to work with :NEW or :OLD values a trigger such as this might prove useful:

    CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER EMPLOYEE_S_BU
      BEFORE UPDATE ON EMPLOYEE
      -- Note: no BEFORE EACH ROW phrase, so this is a statement trigger
    BEGIN
      -- The following FOR loop should insert rows into BLOCKED_MANAGER for all
      -- supervisors which have four or more employees under them and who are not
      -- already in BLOCKED_MANAGER.
    
      FOR aRow IN (SELECT e.SUPERSSN, COUNT(e.SUPERSSN) AS EMP_COUNT
                     FROM EMPLOYEE e
                     LEFT OUTER JOIN BLOCKED_MANAGER b
                       ON b.SSN = e.SUPERSSN
                     WHERE b.SSN IS NULL
                     GROUP BY e.SUPERSSN
                     HAVING COUNT(e.SUPERSSN) >= 4)
      LOOP
        INSERT INTO BLOCKED_MANAGER
          (SSN, EMPLOYEE_COUNT)
        VALUES
          (aRow.SUPERSSN, aRow.EMP_COUNT);
      END LOOP;
    
      -- Remove rows from BLOCKED_MANAGER for managers who supervise fewer
      -- than four employees.
    
      FOR aRow IN (SELECT e.SUPERSSN, COUNT(e.SUPERSSN) AS EMP_COUNT
                     FROM EMPLOYEE e
                     INNER JOIN BLOCKED_MANAGER b
                       ON b.SSN = e.SUPERSSN
                     GROUP BY e.SUPERSSN
                     HAVING COUNT(e.SUPERSSN) <= 3)
      LOOP
        DELETE FROM BLOCKED_MANAGER
          WHERE SSN = aRow.SUPERSSN;
      END LOOP;      
    
      -- Finally, if any supervisor has five or more employees under them,
      -- raise an exception. Note that we go directly to EMPLOYEE to determine
      -- the number of employees supervised.
    
      FOR aRow IN (SELECT SUPERSSN, COUNT(*) AS EMP_COUNT
                     FROM EMPLOYEE
                     GROUP BY SUPERSSN
                     HAVING COUNT(*) >= 5)
      LOOP
        -- If we get here we've found a supervisor with 5 (or more) employees.
        -- Raise an exception
    
        RAISE_APPLICATION_ERROR(-20000, 'Found supervisor ' || aRow.SUPERSSN ||
                                        ' supervising ' || aRow.EMP_COUNT ||
                                        ' employees');
      END LOOP;
    END EMPLOYEE_S_BU;
    

    Note that if you get rid of the BLOCKED_MANAGER table (which this trigger still maintains, although I don't know if it's truly necessary) the logic gets cut down considerably.

    You'll still need a row trigger to handle the logging, but as that's just a matter of cutting down your existing trigger I'll leave that to you. :-)

    Share and enjoy.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题