I\'m writing a PL/pgSQL function in PostgreSQL 9.3.10 to return who has attended certain classes/sessions from the following table:
Attendance
+-------+-----
If you pass an array of records to the function it is simple:
with attendance (class, section, name) as(values
(1, 1, 'Amy'),
(1, 1, 'Bill'),
(1, 2, 'Charlie'),
(1, 2, 'Dan'),
(2, 1, 'Emily'),
(2, 1, 'Fred'),
(2, 2, 'George')
)
select *
from attendance
where (class, section) = any(array[(1,1),(2,2)])
;
class | section | name
-------+---------+--------
1 | 1 | Amy
1 | 1 | Bill
2 | 2 | George
You can achieve that with a simple SQL function. Key feature is the function generate_subscripts():
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION f_attendance(_arr2d int[])
RETURNS SETOF attendance AS
$func$
SELECT a.*
FROM generate_subscripts($1, 1) i
JOIN attendance a ON a.class = $1[i][1]
AND a.section = $1[i][2]
$func$ LANGUAGE ROWS 10 sql STABLE;
Call:
SELECT * FROM f_attendance(ARRAY[[1,1],[2,2]]);
Or the same with an array literal - which is more convenient in some contexts, especially with prepared statements:
SELECT * FROM f_attendance('{{1,1},{2,2}}');
The function always expects a 2D array. Even if you pass a single pair, nest it:
SELECT * FROM f_attendance('{{1,1}}');
You made the function VOLATILE
, but it can be STABLE
. Per documentation:
Because of this snapshotting behavior, a function containing only
SELECT
commands can safely be markedSTABLE
.
Related:
You also use LANGUAGE plpgsql
instead of sql
, which makes sense if you execute the function multiple times in the same session. But then you must also make it STABLE
or you lose that potential performance benefit. The manual once more:
STABLE
andIMMUTABLE
functions use a snapshot established as of the start of the calling query, whereas VOLATILE functions obtain a fresh snapshot at the start of each query they execute.
Your EXPLAIN
output shows an Index Only Scan, not a sequential scan like you suspect in your comment.
There is also a sort step in your EXPLAIN
output that does not match the code you show. Are you sure you copied the right EXPLAIN
output? How did you obtain it anyway? PL/pgSQL functions are black boxes to EXPLAIN
. Did you use auto_explain
? Details:
The Postgres query planner has no idea how many array elements the passed parameter will have, so it is hard to plan the query and it may default to a sequential scan (depending on more factors). You can help by declaring the expected number of rows. If you typically don't have more than 10 items add ROWS 10
like I did now above. And test again.