I have the following code where I am trying to put the StringBuffer objects as keys in a TreeSet. The reason I do this is to see if I can put mutable objects as keys. I do n
Declaring a class final
doesn't mean that it's immutable, it means that no class is allowed to subclass it. In fact, StringBuffer
is very mutable; that's the point of the class.
Because StringBuffer
is not Comparable
, your TreeSet
doesn't know how to sort your StringBuffers
. However, it's a bad idea to have a mutable object be a key in any kind of Set
(or Map
). If you must use a TreeSet
, then create and use a custom Comparator
object that compares StringBuffer
objects.
The fact that StringBuffer
is public final class StringBuffer
means you can't subclass it. StringBuffer is quite mutable (that's the point, you can modify the contents of the buffer.)
You don't want to use something that is mutable as the key because then after the object is modified, its equals() and hashcode() methods will return different results and you won't be able to find it in the Map anymore.
If you really wanted to use StringBuffer in a TreeSet, you would have to provide your own Comparator since StringBuffer doesn't implement Comparable.
Yes, you can but as the above answers state, you must write a Comparator.
But the real question is why would you want to? The purpose of a StringBuffer is to modify the state while creating a string. Since it is a key in your SortedMap you shouldn't be modifying the key, so there is no point in saving the StringBuffer. What you want to do is call StringBuffer.toString() which returns a String and use the String as your key.
The issue is that TreeSet
sorts the items you put in it. Because StringBuffer
doesn't implement Comparable
, the TreeSet
doesn't know how to sort them. You should pass in a Comparator
when you create the TreeSet
. Your comparator will tell the TreeSet
how to sort the StringBuffer
s. Either that, or you can use a HashSet
, which does not sort the elements.
As far as immutability goes: the final keyword on a class declaration means you can't subclass (extend) it. It does not, in and of itself, make the class immutable. Immutable means that the state of the object cannot be changed once it has been created. StringBuffer
s definitely can have their state changed after they are created, so they are not immutable.
You are asking several questions:
You have somethings confused and I will help you to sort them out
There are 2 identifying strategies used with Maps in Java (more-or-less).
Hashing: An input "Foo" is converted into a best-as-possible attempt to generate a number that uniquely accesses an index into an array. (Purists, please don't abuse me, I am intentionally simplifying). This index is where your value is stored. There is the likely possibility that "Foo" and "Bar" actually generate the same index value meaning they would both be mapped to the same array position. Obviously this can't work and so that's where the "equals()" method comes in; it is used to disambiguate
Comparison: By using a comparative method you don't need this extra disambiguation step because comparison NEVER produces this collision in the first place. The only key that "Foo" is equal to is "Foo". A really good idea though is if you can is to define "equals()" as compareTo() == 0; for consistency sake. Not a requirement.
Now to your general question:
Can a key to a map be mutable. Answer: Yes, very very bad and dumb. Example: Map.put(k,v); k.modifyInternalHash(); Map.get(k) = null; // bad here
In reality this happens through carelessness of hashing. Though this can occur with Comparative Maps it will be a much easier problem to diagnos.
Can a StringBuffer be used as a key to a TreeMap/Set ? Yes. Use the alternative constructor: TreeSet(Comparator< T > comparator) and define your own comparison method for StringBuffer
Good luck
just add a comparator class and then use it in your TreeSet as follows:
class Comparatorbuff implements Comparator<StringBuffer> {
@Override
public int compare(StringBuffer s1, StringBuffer s2) {
return s1.toString().compareTo(s2.toString());
}
}
in your main method: modify as follows
Set<StringBuffer> sb=new TreeSet<StringBuffer>(new Comparatorbuff());