I know that when comparing stuff for equality in a batch file it\'s common to enclose both sides in quotes, like
IF \"%myvar% NEQ \"0\"
Bu
Let us assume the batch file contains:
@echo off
:PromptUser
rem Undefine environment variable MyVar in case of being already defined by chance.
set "MyVar="
rem Prompt user for a positive number in range 0 to 20000.
set /P "MyVar=Enter number [0,20000]: "
As I explained by my answer on How to stop Windows command interpreter from quitting batch file execution on an incorrect user input? the user has the freedom to enter really anything including a string which could easily result in breaking batch file execution because of a syntax error or resulting in doing something the batch file is not written for.
If the user hits just key RETURN or ENTER, the environment variable MyVar
is not modified at all by command SET. It is easy to verify in this case with environment variable MyVar
explicitly undefined before prompting the user if the user entered a string at all with:
if not defined MyVar goto PromptUser
Note: It is possible to use something different than set "MyVar="
like set "MyVar=1000"
to define a default value which can be even output on prompt giving the user the possibility to just hit RETURN or ENTER to use the default value.
"
The user could enter a string with one or more "
intentionally or by mistake. For example pressing on a German keyboard key 2 on non-numeric keyboard with CapsLock currently enabled results in entering "
, except German (IBM) is used on which CapsLock is by software only active for the letters. So if the user hits 2 and RETURN quickly or without looking on screen as many people do on typing on keyboard, a double quote character instead of 2
was entered by mistake by the user.
On MyVar
holding a string with one or more "
all %MyVar%
or "%MyVar%"
environment variable references are problematic because of %MyVar%
is replaced by Windows command processor by user input string with one or more "
which nearly always results in a syntax error or the batch file does something it was not designed for. See also How does the Windows Command Interpreter (CMD.EXE) parse scripts?
There are two solutions:
!MyVar!
or "!MyVar!"
as now the user input string does not affect anymore the command line executed by cmd.exe
after parsing it."
from user input string if this string should never contain a double quote character.Character "
is definitely invalid in a string which should be a number in range 0
to 20000
(decimal). For that reason two more lines can be used to prevent wrong processing of user input string caused by "
.
set "MyVar=%MyVar:"=%"
if not defined MyVar goto PromptUser
The Windows command processor removes all doubles quotes already on parsing this line before replacing %MyVar:"=%
with the resulting string. Therefore the finally executed command line set "MyVar=whatever was entered by the user"
is safe on execution.
The example above with a by mistake entered "
instead of 2
results in execution of set "MyVar="
which undefines the environment variable MyVar
which is the reason why the IF condition as used before must be used again before further processing of the user input.
The user should enter a positive decimal number in range 0
to 20000
. So any other character than 0123456789
in user input string is definitely invalid. Checking for any invalid character can be done for example with:
for /F delims^=0123456789^ eol^= %%I in ("%MyVar%") do goto PromptUser
The command FOR does not execute goto PromptUser
if the entire string consists of just digits. In all other cases including a string starting with ;
after zero or more digits results in execution of goto PromptUser
because of input string contains a non-digit character.
0
Windows command processor interprets numbers with a leading 0
as octal numbers. But the number should be interpreted as decimal number even on user input it with one or more 0
at beginning. For that reason the leading zero(s) should be removed before further processing variable value.
for /F "tokens=* delims=0" %%I in ("%MyVar%") do set "MyVar=%%I"
if not defined MyVar set "MyVar=0"
FOR removes all 0
at beginning of string assigned to MyVar
and assigns to loop variable I
the remaining string which is assigned next to environment variable MyVar
.
FOR runs in this case set "MyVar=%%I"
even on user entered 0
or 000
with the result of executing set "MyVar="
which undefines environment variable MyVar
in this special case. But 0
is a valid number and therefore the IF condition is necessary to redefine MyVar
with string value 0
on user entered number 0
with one or more zeros.
Now it is safe to use the command IF with operator GTR
to validate if the user entered a too large number.
if %MyVar% GTR 20000 goto PromptUser
This last verification works even on user entering 82378488758723872198735897
which is larger than maximum positive 32 bit integer value 2147483647
because of the range overflow results in using 2147483647
on execution of this IF condition. See my answer on weird results with IF for details.
An entire batch file for safe evaluation of user input number in range 0
to 20000
for only decimal numbers is:
@echo off
set "MinValue=0"
set "MaxValue=20000"
:PromptUser
rem Undefine environment variable MyVar in case of being already defined by chance.
set "MyVar="
rem Prompt user for a positive number in range %MinValue% to %MaxValue%.
set /P "MyVar=Enter number [%MinValue%,%MaxValue%]: "
if not defined MyVar goto PromptUser
set "MyVar=%MyVar:"=%"
if not defined MyVar goto PromptUser
for /F delims^=0123456789^ eol^= %%I in ("%MyVar%") do goto PromptUser
for /F "tokens=* delims=0" %%I in ("%MyVar%") do set "MyVar=%%I"
if not defined MyVar set "MyVar=0"
if %MyVar% GTR %MaxValue% goto PromptUser
rem if %MyVar% LSS %MinValue% goto PromptUser
rem Output value of environment variable MyVar for visual verification.
set MyVar
pause
This solution gives the batch file writer also the possibility to output an error message informing the user why the input string was not accepted by the batch file.
The last IF condition with operator LSS
is not needed if MinValue
has value 0
which is the reason why it is commented out with command REM for this use case.
Here is one more safe solution which has the disadvantage that the user cannot enter a decimal number with one or more leading 0
being nevertheless interpreted decimal as expected usually by users.
@echo off
set "MinValue=0"
set "MaxValue=20000"
:PromptUser
rem Undefine environment variable MyVar in case of being already defined by chance.
set "MyVar="
rem Prompt user for a positive number in range %MinValue% to %MaxValue%.
set /P "MyVar=Enter number [%MinValue%,%MaxValue%]: "
if not defined MyVar goto PromptUser
setlocal EnableDelayedExpansion
set /A "Number=MyVar" 2>nul
if not "!Number!" == "!MyVar!" endlocal & goto PromptUser
endlocal
if %MyVar% GTR %MaxValue% goto PromptUser
if %MyVar% LSS %MinValue% goto PromptUser
rem Output value of environment variable MyVar for visual verification.
set MyVar
pause
This solution uses delayed environment variable expansion as written as first option on point 2 above.
An arithmetic expression is used to convert the user input string to a signed 32 bit integer interpreting the string as decimal, octal or hexadecimal number and back to a string assigned to environment variable Number
on which decimal numeral system is used by Windows command processor. An error output on evaluation of the arithmetic expression because of an invalid user string is redirected to device NUL to suppress it.
Next is verified with using delayed expansion if the number string created by the arithmetic expression is not identical to the string entered by the user. This IF condition is true on invalid user input including number having leading zeros interpreted octal by cmd.exe
or a number entered hexadecimal like 0x14
or 0xe3
.
On passing the string comparison it is safe to compare value of MyVar
with 20000
and 0
using the operators GTR
and LSS
.
Please read this answer for details about the commands SETLOCAL and ENDLOCAL because there is much more done on running setlocal EnableDelayedExpansion
and endlocal
than just enabling and disabling delayed environment variable expansion.
There is one more solution using less command lines if the value 0
is out of valid range, i.e. the number to enter by the user must be greater 0
.
@echo off
set "MinValue=1"
set "MaxValue=20000"
:PromptUser
rem Undefine environment variable MyVar in case of being already defined by chance.
set "MyVar="
rem Prompt user for a positive number in range %MinValue% to %MaxValue%.
set /P "MyVar=Enter number [%MinValue%,%MaxValue%]: "
set /A MyVar+=0
if %MyVar% GTR %MaxValue% goto PromptUser
if %MyVar% LSS %MinValue% goto PromptUser
rem Output value of environment variable MyVar for visual verification.
set MyVar
pause
This code uses set /A MyVar+=0
to convert the user entered string to a 32-bit signed integer value and back to a string as suggested by aschipfl in his comment above.
The value of MyVar
is 0
after command line with the arithmetic expression if the user did not input any string at all. It is also 0
if the user input string has as first character not one of these characters -+0123456789
like "
or /
or (
.
A user input string starting with a digit, or -
or +
and next character is a digit, is converted to an integer value and back to a string value. The entered string can be a decimal number or an octal number or a hexadecimal number. Please take a look on my answer on Symbol equivalent to NEQ, LSS, GTR, etc. in Windows batch files which explains in detail how Windows command processor converts a string to an integer value.
The disadvantage of this code is that a by mistake input string like 7"(
instead of 728
caused by holding Shift on pressing the keys 2 and ( on a German keyboard is not detected by this code. MyVar
has value 7
on user enters by mistake 7"(
. Windows command processor interprets just the characters up to first not valid character for a decimal, hexadecimal or octal number as integer value and ignores the rest of the string.
The batch file using this code is safe against an unwanted exit of batch file processing because of a syntax error never occurs independent on what the user inputs. But a by mistake wrong input number is in some cases not detected by the code resulting in processing the batch file further with a number which the user did not want to use.
Mofi has been requesting I write my own solution here, that is "shorter" as I pointed out to him the way he wrote his code using &
instead of (
followed by a command then a carriage return and another command, or `( followed by a carriage return, followed by another command followed by a carriage return followed by another command) sets a precedent which makes this a hard task to agree on.
I also did not think this was the POINT of providing the answers perse, I mean I used to, but when changes are minor, and mainly fixing logic, or offering a minorly different solution, is that really a big difference? Does that really warrant being a separate answer?
That said, I don't see a better way without editing his response.. but this still leaves unresolved questions on what is being judged shorter.
Unfortunately as well, in discussing with Mofi he has edited his answer to one that can result in invalid choices.
While I have pointed this out, and I'm sure this was just a minor oversite on his part, I feel like not posting the code here has contributed to him actively deteriorating the quality of his question, which is always a possible outcome when nitpicking.
while Mofi was the driving force in that activity, I don't like the effect it's had on him as I was trying to avoid exactly this effect on my code by not getting into it, so I have decided to post the code comparison to bring some closure for them.
Please not, I will post his original code (the most recent one that did not use the erroneous method), and then refactored to how I would write it, and I will post my Original code, and then refactored to how I believe he would write it (may not be in that order but I will call out each)
This is hard to say if you should count every line, there are some instances where & is used to queue up commands and the IFS never use Parenthesis which I wouldn't generally do.
@echo off
set "MinValue=0"
set "MaxValue=20000"
:PromptUser
rem Undefine environment variable MyVar in case of being already defined by chance.
set "MyVar="
rem Prompt user for a positive number in range %MinValue% to %MaxValue%.
set /P "MyVar=Enter number [%MinValue%,%MaxValue%]: "
if not defined MyVar goto PromptUser
setlocal EnableDelayedExpansion
set /A "Number=MyVar" 2>nul
if not "!Number!" == "!MyVar!" endlocal & goto PromptUser
endlocal
if %MyVar% GTR %MaxValue% goto PromptUser
if %MyVar% LSS %MinValue% goto PromptUser
rem Output value of environment variable MyVar for visual verification.
set MyVar
pause
@ECHO OFF
SETLOCAL EnableDelayedExpansion
SET /A "_Min=-1","_Max=20000"
:Menu
CLS
SET "_Input="
REM Prompt user for a positive number in range %_Min% to %_Max%.
SET /P "_Input=Enter number [%_Min%,%_Max%]: "
SET /A "_Tmp=%_input%" && if /I "!_input!" EQU "!_Tmp!" if !_Input! GEQ %_Min% if !_Input! LEQ %_Max% SET _Input & pause & GOTO :EOF
GOTO :Menu
Mofi's above code Refactored to my more compacted form Where (
have the first command follow except when used on an IF
statement, and )
follow the last command. This also makes the entire portion that really does the validation EASY to discern, it is only the portion within the :PromtUser
function, not counting REM
lines or blank
lines this is 13 lines of code.
@(SETLOCAL
echo off
SET /A "MinValue=0","MaxValue=20000")
CALL :Main
( ENDLOCAL
EXIT /B )
:Main
CALL :PromptUser MyVar
REM Output value of environment variable MyVar for visual verIFication.
SET MyVar
PAUSE
GOTO :EOF
:PromptUser
SET "MyVar="
rem Prompt user for a positive number in range %MinValue% to %MaxValue%.
SET /P "MyVar=Enter number [%MinValue%,%MaxValue%]: "
IF NOT DEFINED MyVar GOTO :PromptUser
Setlocal EnableDelayedExpansion
SET /A "Number=MyVar" 2>nul
IF not "!Number!" == "!MyVar!" (
Endlocal
GOTO :PromptUser )
Endlocal
IF %MyVar% GTR %MaxValue% (
GOTO :PromptUser )
IF %MyVar% LSS %MinValue% (
GOTO :PromptUser )
GOTO :EOF
To compare here is my code also in the same compact form I refactored Mofi's code to above. Again, only the lines inside of the function itself are "doing the heavy lifting" here and need compare. I did forget that when I worked on my code originally I was trying to match Mofi's form, and it allowed me an extra nicety in keeping my && ( in the following line or all as a single line. So I will post two varients
@(SETLOCAL ENABLEDELAYEDEXPANSION
ECHO OFF
SET /A "_Min=-1","_Max=20000" )
CALL :Main
( ENDLOCAL
EXIT /B )
:Main
CALL :Menu _input
REM Output value of environment variable _input for visual verIFication.
SET _input
PAUSE
GOTO :EOF
:Menu
CLS
SET "_input="
REM Prompt user for a positive number in range %_Min% to %_Max%. Store it in "_input"
SET /P "_Input=Enter number [%_Min%,%_Max%]: "
SET /A "_Tmp=%_input%" && (
IF /I "!_input!" EQU "!_Tmp!" IF !_Input! GEQ %_Min% IF !_Input! LEQ %_Max% GOTO :EOF )
GOTO :Menu
@(SETLOCAL ENABLEDELAYEDEXPANSION
ECHO OFF
SET /A "_Min=-1","_Max=20000" )
CALL :Main
( ENDLOCAL
EXIT /B )
:Main
CALL :Menu
REM Output value of environment variable _input for visual verification.
SET _input
PAUSE
GOTO :EOF
:Menu
CLS
SET "_input="
REM Prompt user for a positive number in range %_Min% to %_Max%. Store it in "_input"
SET /P "_Input=Enter number [%_Min%,%_Max%]: "
SET /A "_Tmp=%_input%" || GOTO :Menu
IF /I "!_input!" EQU "!_Tmp!" (
IF !_Input! GEQ %_Min% (
IF !_Input! LEQ %_Max% (
GOTO :EOF ) ) )
GOTO :Menu