Assume I have a method that multiplies two std::vector
:
double multiply(std::vector const& a, std::vector const
Add the pragma to both functions. You can turn the nested parallelism on and off with omp_set_nested(int val)
(zero for off, non-zero for on).
So, if you wanted nested parallelism on in your program in general, but off for the many_multiplication
function, you would implement many_multiplication
as follows:
void many_multiplication(std::vector<double>* a, std::vector<double>* b, unsigned int N){
omp_set_nested(0);
#pragma omp parallel loop for
for(unsigned int i=0;i<N;i++){
for(unsigned int j=0;j<N;j++){
multiply(a[i],b[j]);
}
}
omp_set_nested(1);
}
Nested parallelism is disabled by default, unless enabled specificially by setting OMP_NESTED
to true
or by calling omp_set_nested(1);
(§2.3.2 of the OpenMP specification) Explicitly modifying the settings for nesting as suggested by Avi Ginsburg is a bad idea. Instead, you should use conditional parallel execution based on the level of nesting:
double multiply(std::vector<double> const& a, std::vector<double> const& b){
double tmp(0);
int active_levels = omp_get_active_level();
#pragma omp parallel for reduction(+:tmp) if(active_level < 1)
for(unsigned int i=0;i<a.size();i++){
tmp += a[i]+b[i];
}
return tmp;
}
omp_get_active_level()
returns the number of active parallel regions that enclose the thread at the moment the call is made. It returns 0
if called from outside a parallel region or with inactive outer region(s). Thanks to the if(active_level < 1)
clause, the parallel region will only be activated, i.e. run in parallel, if it is not enclosed in an active region, regardless of the setting for nesting.
If your compiler does not support OpenMP 3.0 or higher (e.g. with any version of MS Visual C/C++ Compiler), then omp_in_parallel()
call can be used instead:
double multiply(std::vector<double> const& a, std::vector<double> const& b){
double tmp(0);
int in_parallel = omp_in_parallel();
#pragma omp parallel for reduction(+:tmp) if(in_parallel == 0)
for(unsigned int i=0;i<a.size();i++){
tmp += a[i]+b[i];
}
return tmp;
}
omp_in_parallel()
returns non-zero if at least one enclosing parallel region is active, but does not provide information about the depth of nesting, i.e. is a bit less flexible.
In any case, writing such code is a bad practice. You should simply leave the parallel regions as they are and allow the end user choose whether nested parallelism should be enabled or not.