Runtime exception, recursion too deep

后端 未结 12 932
余生分开走
余生分开走 2020-12-19 04:59

I converted the pseudo-code here into C#, and have it recursively repeat 10,000 times. But I get a C# runtime error, StackOverflow Exception after 9217

相关标签:
12条回答
  • 2020-12-19 05:45

    Iterative version:

    public static double CalculatePi(int maxRecursion)
    {
        double result=1;
        for(int i=maxRecursion-1;i>=1;i--)
        {
            result=1+i/(2.0*i+1)*result;  
        }
        return result*2;
    }
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-19 05:46

    So everybody seems to agree that i need to convert this to iterative... can anybody give some code? I can't seem to write any iterative code that works...

    Are you asking for a fish, or asking to be taught how to catch fish? If the point of this exercise is to learn how to convert recursive code to iterative code then you're not well served by just getting the answer.

    To convert recursive code to iterative code there are lots of possible ways to do it. The easiest way in this case is to simply work out the pattern. What does the code do? It computes:

    (1 + 1 / (2.0 * 1 + 1)) * 
    (1 + 2 / (2.0 * 2 + 1)) * 
    (1 + 3 / (2.0 * 3 + 1)) * 
    (1 + 4 / (2.0 * 4 + 1)) * 
    (1 + 5 / (2.0 * 5 + 1)) * 
    (1 + 6 / (2.0 * 6 + 1)) * 
    (1 + 7 / (2.0 * 7 + 1)) * 
    ...
    (1 + 9999/ (2.0 * 9999+ 1)) *
    1
    

    Now can you write a loop that computes that? Sure.

    double product = 1.0;
    for (int i = 9999; i >= 0; --i)
        product *= (1 + i / (2.0 * i + 1));
    

    That's the easiest way to do it. But there are lots of ways to solve this problem.

    You could use an aggregator. Consider the "total" operation; that's an example of an aggregator. You have a sequence of things and you keep a running total of them, accumulating the result in an accumulator. The standard query operators have an aggregation operation supplied for you:

    double seed = 1.0;
    Enumerable.Range(0, 10000).Aggregate(seed, 
        (product, i) => product * (1 + i / (2.0 * i + 1))
    

    Or, you could keep your algorithm recursive but eliminate the stack overflow by:

    • building your own stack structure on the heap
    • defining a virtual machine, writing your program in the virtual machine language, and then implementing the virtual machine to keep its stack on the heap.
    • rewriting your program in Continuation Passing Style; every step along the way then returns a continuation to the caller, which invokes the next continuation; the stack never gets deep

    Explaining those techniques takes too long for one answer. I have a six-part blog series on how to use those techniques to turn recursive programs into programs that don't consume much stack; start reading it here:

    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ericlippert/archive/2005/07/25/recursion-part-zero.aspx

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-19 05:48

    This woudl be the non recursive variant:

            private double CalculatePi(int maxRecursion)
        {
            return 2 * CalculatePi2(maxRecursion, 1);
        }
    
        private double CalculatePi2(int maxRecursion, int i)
        {
            double product = 1;
            while (i < maxRecursion)
            {
                product = product * (1f + i / (2.0f * i + 1f));
                i++;
            }
            return product;
        }
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-19 05:50

    Since you're almost able to run the program, you can just make it use less stack space. Just run in Release mode instead of Debug and it should work.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-19 05:50

    The iterative code to do this is simply:

    private double CalculatePi(int iterations) {
      double pi = 1.0;
      for (int i = iterations - 1; i >= 1; i--) {
        pi = 1 + i / (2.0 * i + 1) * pi;
      }
      return pi * 2.0;
    }
    

    Usage:

    double pi = CalculatePi(51);
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-19 05:53

    The "c# compiler" will compile this fine. At runtime, however, you may end up with a StackOverflow exception (on my machine, 10,000 works fine, but dies later).

    This is not an "infinite recursion exception" - stack overflow is exactly what it says; calling a method means putting information on the stack and removing it when the call returns. You have 10,000 calls and none have returned, so the stack is full and the exception is thrown.

    You can fix this fairly easily in this particular case by removing the recursion and running iteratively. In the general case, there are ways to remove recursion via iteration, tail-recursion optimization, and continuation passing.

    Here's a quick direct translation to an iterative style:

    private static double CalculatePi(int maxRecursion)
            {
                double result = 1;
                for (int i = maxRecursion -1; i >= 1; i-- )
                {
                    result = 1 + i / (2.0 * i + 1) * result;
                }
                return result * 2;
            }
    
    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题