Overloading + operator in F#

前端 未结 5 2110
半阙折子戏
半阙折子戏 2020-12-18 05:34

So i have this:

open System
open System.Linq
open Microsoft.FSharp.Collections
type Microsoft.FSharp.Collections.List<\'a> with
    static member (+) (         


        
相关标签:
5条回答
  • 2020-12-18 05:44

    As pointed out by the other answers, you cannot add implementation of + to an existing type, because extension members are ignored and standalone let binding hides the default (overloaded) implementation.

    If you wanted to use + (which is not really needed because F# library contains operator @), you would have to write wrapper for F# list that supports the operator directly:

    open System.Collections
    open System.Collections.Generic
    
    /// Wrapper for F# list that exposes '+' operator and 
    /// implements 'IEnumerable<_>' in order to work with 'for'
    type PlusList<'T>(list : list<'T>) =
      member x.List = list
      static member (+) (first : PlusList<'a>, second : PlusList<'a>) =
        first.List @ second.List
      interface IEnumerable with
        member x.GetEnumerator() = (list :> IEnumerable).GetEnumerator()
      interface IEnumerable<'T> with
        member x.GetEnumerator() = (list :> IEnumerable<_>).GetEnumerator()
    
    // Simple function to wrap list
    let pl l = PlusList<_>(l)
    
    let a = pl [1; 2; 3; 4; 54; 9]
    let b = pl [3; 5; 6; 4; 54]
    
    for x in a + b do
      System.Console.WriteLine(x)
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-18 05:45

    First, overriding operators should be declared in the tuple form, not in the carried form. In your case:

    type Microsoft.FSharp.Collections.List<'a> with
        static member (+) (first: List<'a>, second: List<'a>) =
            first.Concat(second)
    

    Second, after you fix that, the compiler raises the "Extension members cannot provide operator overloads. Consider defining the operator as part of the type definition instead." warning. There are some workarounds which have been discussed thoroughly in Overload operator in F#: (/).

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-18 05:48

    Actually there is a way to 're-wire' existing operators, using static constraints and overloads.

    type ListExtension = ListExtension with
        static member        (?<-) (ListExtension, a , b) = a @ b
        static member inline (?<-) (ListExtension, a , b) = a + b
    
    let inline (+) a b = (?<-) ListExtension a b
    
    // test
    
    let lst = [1;2] + [3;4]
    // val lst : int list = [1; 2; 3; 4]
    
    let sum = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4
    // val sum : int = 10
    

    By using the ternary operator the static constraints will be automatically inferred, another option would be to create a method and write the constraints by hand. The first overload cover the case you want to add (lists), the second covers the existing definition.

    So now in your code you can do:

    for x in (+) a b do
        Console.WriteLine(x)
    

    And that will not break existing (+) for numeric types.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-18 06:02

    Note that @ is already a 1-char infix operator to concat lists.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-18 06:08

    I think operator overloading using extension method doesn't work. What you can do is define a global operator overload for list (+) using:

    let inline (+) (f : List<'a>) (s : List<'a>) = f.Concat(s) 
    
    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题