Why don't more projects use Ruby Symbols instead of Strings?

前端 未结 4 1451
南笙
南笙 2020-12-17 18:29

When I first started reading about and learning ruby, I read something about the power of ruby symbols over strings: symbols are stored in memory only once, while strings ar

相关标签:
4条回答
  • 2020-12-17 18:56

    The main difference is that multiple symbols representing a single value are identical whereas this is not true with strings. For example:

    irb(main):007:0> :test.object_id
    => 83618
    irb(main):008:0> :test.object_id
    => 83618
    irb(main):009:0> :test.object_id
    => 83618
    

    3 references to the symbol :test, all the same object.

    irb(main):010:0> "test".object_id
    => -605770378
    irb(main):011:0> "test".object_id
    => -605779298
    irb(main):012:0> "test".object_id
    => -605784948
    

    3 references to the string "test", all different objects.

    This means that using symbols can potentially save a good bit of memory depending on the application. It is also faster to compare symbols for equality since they are the same object, comparing identical strings is much slower since the string values need to be compared instead of just the object ids.

    I usually use strings for almost everything except things like hash keys where I really want a unique identifier, not a string

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-17 18:58

    One reason for the usage of strings may be the usage of yaml to define the values.

    require 'yaml'
    data = YAML.load(<<-data
        one:
          title: one
          tag: 1
        two:
          title: two
          tag: 2
      data
      )  #-> {"one"=>{"title"=>"one", "tag"=>1}, "two"=>{"title"=>"two", "tag"=>2}}
    

    You may use yaml to define symbol-keys:

    require 'yaml'
    data = YAML.load(<<-data
        :one:
          :title: one
          :tag: 1
        :two:
          :title: two
          :tag: 2
      data
      ) #-> {:one=>{:title=>"one", :tag=>1}, :two=>{:title=>"two", :tag=>2}}
    

    But in the yaml-definition symbols look a bit strange, strings looks more natural.

    Another reason for strings as keys: Depending on the use case, it can be reasonable to sort by keys, but you can't sort symbols (at least not without a conversion to strings).

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-17 19:03

    In ruby, after creating the AST, each symbol is represented as a unique integer. Having symbols as hash keys makes the computing a lot faster, as the main operation is comparison.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-17 19:16

    Symbols are not garbage collected AFAIK, so that might be a thing to watch out for, but except for that they really are great as hash keys.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题