My problem is as follows: Martin York claims in this, this, and this answers that one can make a stringstream
read from some piece of memory by using basi
After spending the last couple of days going through the documentation and the the proposals that have been made it now seems clear that this may not work (as it is implementation defined).
As you note in your description above:
27.5.2.4.2: 1 Effects: Influences stream buffering in a way that is defined separately for each class derived from basic_streambuf in this Clause (27.8.1.4, 27.9.1.5).
The effect of setbuf() is really defined by its interaction with 27.8.1.4 underflow();
Returns: If the input sequence has a read position available, returns traits::to_int_type(*gptr()). Otherwise, returns traits::eof(). Any character in the underlying buffer which has been initialized is considered to be part of the input sequence.
Also for getting more characters from the stream you need to check 27.9.1.5 showmanyc()
An implementation might well provide an overriding definition for this function signature if it can determine that more characters can be read from the input sequence.
Which for the stringstream buffer means it will not get anything as the buffer already holds the whole stream.
So though it is implementation defined how it does it.
It is still well defined how it does it.
I believe it is implementation defined and that you provided the relevant quotes.
For the record, this is what Standard C++ IOStreams and locales, not exactly a recent book I have to admit, has to say on the subject in a section titled "The almost semantic free function - setbuf()
" :
The virtual member function
setbuf()
is a rather peculiar stream buffer member. Its semantics are basically undefined. For string stream buffers, the semantics ofsetbuf()
are implementation-defined, except thatsetbuf(0, 0)
are defined: ifsetbuf(0, 0)
is called on a stream before and I/O has occured on that stream, the stream becomes unbuffered, meaning that characters are directly transported to and from the file system. Otherwise, the results are implementation-defined.However, the specifications of
setbuf()
forbasic_filebuf
andbasic_stringbuf
hardly impose any requirements on the semantics ofsetbuf()
in other stream buffer types. At best, the general semantics can be defined as device and, in the case of user-defined stream buffer types, implementation-specific.The lack of any requirements frees you to redefine
setbuf()
for just about any purpose and in any way that fits into the predefined interface ofsetbuf()
.