I am trying to create a transaction comprising two REST web services, whose data source point to the same data base. The first service, named 1
, invokes another
rest web services (http based) are non-transactional by their nature (they are http based). you have made each method/operation transactional, but they do not share any state between the resources (rest operations). generally - you can have XA transactions over database or mesaging, not over http calls.
intRes2 = restTemplate.postForObject("http://localhost:8080/servicio2-1.0-
SNAPSHOT/servicio/2",numero,Integer.class);
Calling a remote web service is without any transaction context. If you need to maintains transaction between services, call the secord service as EJB (or as an injected managed bean)
Basically: using http-based rest services - forget any transactions between them. The protocol (HTTP) is not built for that.
The only thing I've seen transactional is SOAP with WS-RM extension (SOAP with reliable messaging)., however it is not very easy to setup (read: it can be nightmare to make it work when you don't know what are you doing) and not all WS frameworks support it.
When you really need reliable delivery between web services, there's a way. what is comonly used to achieve assured delivery is messaging with idempotent services (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idempotence) with store-and-forward pattern. In simple terms - service 1 stores a JMS message to a queue and there's a processor (MDB) which calls service 2. (yes, calling a remote web service it may happen that the service 2 will receive a message multiple times. Indempotency is a way how to deal with it.)
How to do Distributed Transactions XA ?
If you invoke first a REST or web service and then another one, both operations will not be part of a transaction. To form a transaction, these operations must "start" a transaction or be "joined" to an existing one. To execute that transaction, your program must interact with a transaction monitor (TM) such as the proposed by AT&T/Oracle Tuxedo (released in the 80s), the X/Open XA standard (released in the 90s) and the JTA-based systems.
Note how the TM-based transaction works:
A transaction using XA datasources is basically a program that invokes database operations on two different databases. The same program (e.g. invoking methods in one or more bean) starts the transaction, performs some operations on a database and performs other operations on another database. If one of the operation fails, the other operations are not performed or are rollbacked.
A transaction using XA datasources and JTA-enabled components is basically a program that combines operations on one or more databases with other transaction-enabled operations. For instance, you can combine operations on a database with operations on a content repository or a network-based file system. You can define transactions that, when a database operation fails, does not perform or rollbacks operations on the file system. Non-transactional applications such as COBOL-based programs can be integrated in a transaction by defining operations and compensations in the transaction monitor.
A transaction integrating web-services requires an special handling. For instance, there is a proposal for webservice transactions such as the WS-Transaction and WS-Coordination specification. There is a coordinator that works like the transaction monitor. The software must invoke the coordinator to start the transaction. Each participant in the transaction reports if each operation is successful or failed. The coordinator invokes the other operations or invokes the compensations according to the results.
Nowadays, there are some proposals for software architecture that do not rely on TM-based transactions. Designs based on CQRS and Event Sourcing implement transactions using the Sagas design pattern. If you are interested on defining a transaction-like operation that invokes two REST services, you may consider to avoid the XA/JTA and program a Sagas.
How to do Distributed Transactions XA in Spring and GlassFish 5?
You may check many tutorials in the Internet. For instance,
If the two services work without errors, there is not problem. However, when the service
1
falls, the service2
does not know about the error and does not do the rollback.
That is the correct behavior. When you invoke a REST/webservice, the operations performed by that REST/webservice do not join to the transaction. If the invoking service fails, the invoked service will not notice it and will not rollback their operations in the database.
I do not know if I need to configure another feature/option in GlassFish 5, or in the Spring program.
No. You only have to configure the XA-datasources. Spring will use your configuration class and annotations to join automatically into a transaction the operations performed by your application on these datasources. For instance, if you have a bean that invokes multiple methods that performs operations on one or more XA-datasources, these operations will join into a transaction.
However, when you invoke a method in REST/webservice in another application, the database operations performed by that REST/webservice will not join to the transaction.
Transactions across REST services are supported by http://www.atomikos.com
Cheers