Ruby: method inexplicably overwritten and set to nil

后端 未结 2 806
醉梦人生
醉梦人生 2020-12-17 00:54

If I execute this ruby code:

def foo
  100
end

p defined?(foo), foo
if false
  foo = 200
end
p defined?(foo), foo

The output I get is:

相关标签:
2条回答
  • 2020-12-17 01:29

    This is what my pal and Ruby super-expert Josh Cheek had to say:

    When Ruby sees the assignment, it initializes the variable in the current scope and sets it to nil. Since the assignment didn't get run, it didn't update the value of foo.

    if statements don't change scope like blocks do. This is also the most important difference between

    for x in xs
    

    and

    xs.each { |x| }
    

    Here's another example:

    a = 123 if a  # => nil
    a  # => nil
    

    We shouldn't be able to say if a because we never set a, but Ruby sees the a = 123 and initializes a, then gets to if a at which point a is nil

    I'd consider it a quirk of the interpreter, really. Gary Bernhardt makes fun of it in wat (https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat) with a = a

    -Josh

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-17 01:35

    Names on the left hand side of assignments get set to nil, even if the code can't be reached as in the if false case.

    >> foo
    NameError: undefined local variable or method `foo' for main:Object
    ...
    >> if false
    ..   foo = 1
    ..   end #=> nil
    >> foo #=> nil
    

    When Ruby tries to resolve barewords, it first looks for local variables (there's a reference to that in the Pickaxe book, which I can't seem to find at the moment). Since you now have one called foo it displays nil. As Mischa noted, the method still can be called as foo().

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题