I\'m making some tedious calls to a bunch of functions, but the parameters will be determined at runtime. I wrote a simple function to keep my code DRY but giving it a name
You can do this the ANSI Common Lisp way (though I think there are some Emacs devels that will give you nasty looks):
(flet ((do-work (x y z)
(do-x x)
(do-y y)
;; etc
))
(cond (test-1 (do-work 'a 'b 'c))
(test-2 (do-work 'i 'j 'k))))
Dunno if you'll first have to (require 'cl)
(or cl-macs
?) to use flet. If you want to define recursive functions you'll need to use labels
IIRC.
Like other lisps (but not Scheme), Emacs Lisp has separate namespaces for variables and functions (i.e. it is a ‘Lisp2’, not a ‘Lisp1’; see Technical Issues of Separation in Function Cells and Value Cells for the origin and meaning of these terms).
You will need to use funcall
or apply
to call a lambda (or other function) that is stored in a variable.
(cond (test-1 (funcall do-work 'a 'b 'c))
(test-2 (funcall do-work 'i 'j 'k))
Use funcall
if you will always send the same number of arguments. Use apply
if you need to be able to send a variable number of arguments.
The internal mechanism is that each symbol has multiple “cells”.
Which cell is used depends on where the symbol is in an evaluated form.
When a symbol is the first element of an evaluated form, its “function” cell is used.
In any other position, its “value” cell is used.
In your code, do-work
has the function in its value cell.
To access it as a function you use funcall
or apply
.
If it were in the function cell, you could call it directly by using its name as the car of an evaluated form.
You can accomplish this with flet or labels from the cl package.
Do (require 'cl)
to pull in the Common Lisp package, then use flet
instead of let
:
(flet ((do-work (x y z)
(do-x x)
(do-y y)
;; etc
))
(cond (test-1 (do-work 'a 'b 'c))
(test-2 (do-work 'i 'j 'k))))