Given a graph G, a node n and a length L, I\'d like to collect all (non-cyclic) paths of length L that depart from n.
Do you have any idea on how to approach this?
A very simple way to approach (and solve entirely) this problem is to use the adjacency matrix A of the graph. The (i,j) th element of A^L is the number of paths between nodes i and j of length L. So if you sum these over all j keeping i fixed at n, you get all paths emanating from node n of length L.
This will also unfortunately count the cyclic paths. These, happily, can be found from the element A^L(n,n)
, so just subtract that.
So your final answer is: Σj{A^L(n,j)} - A^L(n,n)
.
Word of caution: say you're looking for paths of length 5 from node 1: this calculation will also count the path with small cycles inside like 1-2-3-2-4
, whose length is 5 or 4 depending on how you choose to see it, so be careful about that.
Use a depth limited search (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depth-limited_search) where you keep a set of visited nodes for the detection of a cycle when on a path. For example you can build a tree from your node n with all nodes and length of L then prune the tree.
I did a quick search of graph algorithms to do this, but didn't find anything. There is a list of graph algorithms (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Graph_algorithms) that may have just what you are looking for.
I would just like to expand on Lance Helsten's excellent answer:
The depth-limited search searches for a particular node within a certain depth (what you're calling the length L), and stops when it finds it. If you will take a look at the pseudocode in the wiki link in his answer, you'll understand this:
DLS(node, goal, depth) {
if ( depth >= 0 ) {
if ( node == goal )
return node
for each child in expand(node)
DLS(child, goal, depth-1)
}
}
In your case, however, as you're looking for all paths of length L from a node, you will not stop anywhere. So the pseudocode must be modified to:
DLS(node, depth) {
for each child in expand(node) {
record paths as [node, child]
DLS(child, depth-1)
}
}
After you're done with recording all the single-link paths from successive nests of the DLS, just take a product of them to get the entire path. The number of these gives you the number of paths of the required depth starting from the node.
This solution might be improved in terms efficiency but it seems very short and makes use of networkx functionality:
G = nx.complete_graph(4)
n = 0
L = 3
result = []
for paths in (nx.all_simple_paths(G, n, target, L) for target in G.nodes_iter()):
print(paths)
result+=paths
Here is another (rather naive) implementation I came up with after reading the answers here:
def findAllPaths(node, childrenFn, depth, _depth=0, _parents={}):
if _depth == depth - 1:
# path found with desired length, create path and stop traversing
path = []
parent = node
for i in xrange(depth):
path.insert(0, parent)
if not parent in _parents:
continue
parent = _parents[parent]
if parent in path:
return # this path is cyclic, forget
yield path
return
for nb in childrenFn(node):
_parents[nb] = node # keep track of where we came from
for p in findAllPaths(nb, childrenFn, depth, _depth + 1, _parents):
yield p
graph = {
0: [1, 2],
1: [4, 5],
2: [3, 10],
3: [8, 9],
4: [6],
5: [6],
6: [7],
7: [],
8: [],
9: [],
10: [2] # cycle
}
for p in findAllPaths(0, lambda n: graph[n], depth=4):
print(p)
# [0, 1, 4, 6]
# [0, 1, 5, 6]
# [0, 2, 3, 8]
# [0, 2, 3, 9]