Does the pixel value of a font-size refer to the height of the font or the width of the font?
CSS:
.sixteen {
font-size: 16px;
}
The height - specifically from the top of the ascenders (e.g., 'h' or 'l' (el)) to the bottom of the descenders (e.g., 'g' or 'y'). See the interesting article on Type Anatomy at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typeface_anatomy.
According to this article by Vincent De Oliveira, the font-size
actually has nothing to do with the actual height of characters. It's not even the height of the inline element that contains text.
Of course, a larger value of the font-size
property results in a larger text. But the pixel value does not directly translate into the actual size of text.
However, the pixel value of font-size
sets the size of 1em
to be used for setting margin, padding, etc.
The font-size
property specifies the size of the font, no matter what unit is used. The size of a font can be characterized as the height of the font, but even this is just a loose and pragmatic description; characters may extend above and below the levels defined by the size of the font. The size is a more or less abstract property, and it should not be expected to correspond to the height (still less the width) of any character.
In particular, it would be all wrong to design a font where the letter “a” occupies the full height of the font. The height of “a” is typically about half of the font size, but this surely varies by font (try testing with “a” in Times New Roman and in Verdana, using the same font size).