I use GoogleMock/GoogleTest for testing, and I\'m seeing some strange behavior when a matcher has a shared_ptr to a mock as a parameter, and EXPECT is called on the same sha
This is a result of holding p
as a shared_ptr
, using InSequence
and the order in which you have declared your expectations.
When you call
EXPECT_CALL(*c, myMethod(Eq(p)));
you increase the use_count
of p
. In order for the leak detection to pass, p
must be destroyed at (or before) the end of TEST
.
The problem here is that internally, gmock maintains a record of the required mock call sequence by holding a pointer to the preceding expectation. So when you call EXPECT_CALL(*p, myMethod());
, it gets a copy of the pointer to the previous expectation.
This then has the effect of blocking the call to p
's destructor when TEST
ends.
In order to work around this, I think your best bet is to call
EXPECT_TRUE(Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(p.get()));
just before you exit TEST
. This clears the expectations on p
, including critically its prerequisite expectation, which in turn allows the destructor of p
to be invoked correctly.
Alternatively, if the order of the mock calls is unimportant, simply removing InSequence dummy;
will also allow p
's destructor to execute.
As an aside, your code has a couple of issues;
MyClass::myMethod
should be virtual in order to allow gmock's function to override itp->myMethod(p);
should be p->myMethod();