Collectors.groupingBy doesn't accept null keys

Question

In Java 8, this works:

Stream stream = Stream.of(ArrayList.class);
HashMap> map = (HashMap)stream.collect(Collect         


        

Answer 1

I had the same kind of problem. This failed, because groupingBy performs Objects.requireNonNull on the value returned from the classifier:

    Map<Long, List<ClaimEvent>> map = events.stream()
      .filter(event -> eventTypeIds.contains(event.getClaimEventTypeId()))
      .collect(groupingBy(ClaimEvent::getSubprocessId));

Using Optional, this works:

    Map<Optional<Long>, List<ClaimEvent>> map = events.stream()
      .filter(event -> eventTypeIds.contains(event.getClaimEventTypeId()))
      .collect(groupingBy(event -> Optional.ofNullable(event.getSubprocessId())));

Answer 2

First of all, you are using lots of raw objects. This is not a good idea at all, first convert the following:

• Class to Class<?>, ie. instead of a raw type, a parametrized type with an unknown class.
• Instead of forcefully casting to a HashMap, you should supply a HashMap to the collector.

First the correctly typed code, without caring about a NPE yet:

Stream<Class<?>> stream = Stream.of(ArrayList.class);
HashMap<Class<?>, List<Class<?>>> hashMap = (HashMap<Class<?>, List<Class<?>>>)stream
        .collect(Collectors.groupingBy(Class::getSuperclass));

Now we get rid of the forceful cast there, and instead do it correctly:

Stream<Class<?>> stream = Stream.of(ArrayList.class);
HashMap<Class<?>, List<Class<?>>> hashMap = stream
        .collect(Collectors.groupingBy(
                Class::getSuperclass,
                HashMap::new,
                Collectors.toList()
        ));

Here we replace the groupingBy which just takes a classifier, to one that takes a classifier, a supplier and a collector. Essentially this is the same as what there was before, but now it is correctly typed.

You are indeed correct that in the javadoc it is not stated that it will throw a NPE, and I do not think it should be throwing one, as I am allowed to supply whatever map I want, and if my map allows null keys, then it should be allowed.

I do not see any other way to do it simpler as of now, I'll try to look more into it.

Answer 3

For the first question, I agree with skiwi that it shouldn't be throwing a NPE. I hope they will change that (or else at least add it to the javadoc). Meanwhile, to answer the second question I decided to use Collectors.toMap instead of Collectors.groupingBy:

Stream<Class<?>> stream = Stream.of(ArrayList.class);

Map<Class<?>, List<Class<?>>> map = stream.collect(
    Collectors.toMap(
        Class::getSuperclass,
        Collections::singletonList,
        (List<Class<?>> oldList, List<Class<?>> newEl) -> {
        List<Class<?>> newList = new ArrayList<>(oldList.size() + 1);
        newList.addAll(oldList);
        newList.addAll(newEl);
        return newList;
        }));

Or, encapsulating it:

/** Like Collectors.groupingBy, but accepts null keys. */
public static <T, A> Collector<T, ?, Map<A, List<T>>>
groupingBy_WithNullKeys(Function<? super T, ? extends A> classifier) {
    return Collectors.toMap(
        classifier,
        Collections::singletonList,
        (List<T> oldList, List<T> newEl) -> {
            List<T> newList = new ArrayList<>(oldList.size() + 1);
            newList.addAll(oldList);
            newList.addAll(newEl);
            return newList;
            });
    }

And use it like this:

Stream<Class<?>> stream = Stream.of(ArrayList.class);
Map<Class<?>, List<Class<?>>> map = stream.collect(groupingBy_WithNullKeys(Class::getSuperclass));

Please note rolfl gave another, more complicated answer, which allows you to specify your own Map and List supplier. I haven't tested it.

Answer 4

I figured I would take a moment and try to digest this issue you have. I put together a SSCE for what I would expect if I did it manually, and what the groupingBy implementation actually does.

I don't think this is an answer, but it is a 'wonder why it is a problem' thing. Also, if you want, feel free to hack this code to have a null-friendly collector.

Edit: A generic-friendly implementation:

/** groupingByNF - NullFriendly - allows you to specify your own Map and List supplier. */
private static final <T,K> Collector<T,?,Map<K,List<T>>> groupingByNF (
        final Supplier<Map<K,List<T>>> mapsupplier,
        final Supplier<List<T>> listsupplier,
        final Function<? super T,? extends K> classifier) {

    BiConsumer<Map<K,List<T>>, T> combiner = (m, v) -> {
        K key = classifier.apply(v);
        List<T> store = m.get(key);
        if (store == null) {
            store = listsupplier.get();
            m.put(key, store);
        }
        store.add(v);
    };

    BinaryOperator<Map<K, List<T>>> finalizer = (left, right) -> {
        for (Map.Entry<K, List<T>> me : right.entrySet()) {
            List<T> target = left.get(me.getKey());
            if (target == null) {
                left.put(me.getKey(), me.getValue());
            } else {
                target.addAll(me.getValue());
            }
        }
        return left;
    };

    return Collector.of(mapsupplier, combiner, finalizer);

}

/** groupingByNF - NullFriendly - otherwise similar to Java8 Collections.groupingBy */
private static final <T,K> Collector<T,?,Map<K,List<T>>> groupingByNF (Function<? super T,? extends K> classifier) {
    return groupingByNF(HashMap::new, ArrayList::new, classifier);
}

Consider this code (the code groups String values based on the String.length(), (or null if the input String is null)):

public static void main(String[] args) {

    String[] input = {"a", "a", "", null, "b", "ab"};

    // How we group the Strings
    final Function<String, Integer> classifier = (a) -> {return a != null ? Integer.valueOf(a.length()) : null;};

    // Manual implementation of a combiner that accumulates a string value based on the classifier.
    // no special handling of null key values.
    BiConsumer<Map<Integer,List<String>>, String> combiner = (m, v) -> {
        Integer key = classifier.apply(v);
        List<String> store = m.get(key);
        if (store == null) {
            store = new ArrayList<String>();
            m.put(key, store);
        }
        store.add(v);
    };

    // The finalizer merges two maps together (right into left)
    // no special handling of null key values.
    BinaryOperator<Map<Integer, List<String>>> finalizer = (left, right) -> {
        for (Map.Entry<Integer, List<String>> me : right.entrySet()) {
            List<String> target = left.get(me.getKey());
            if (target == null) {
                left.put(me.getKey(), me.getValue());
            } else {
                target.addAll(me.getValue());
            }
        }
        return left;
    };

    // Using a manual collector
    Map<Integer, List<String>> manual = Arrays.stream(input).collect(Collector.of(HashMap::new, combiner, finalizer));

    System.out.println(manual);

    // using the groupingBy collector.        
    Collector<String, ?, Map<Integer, List<String>>> collector = Collectors.groupingBy(classifier);

    Map<Integer, List<String>> result = Arrays.stream(input).collect(collector);

    System.out.println(result);
}

The above code produces the output:

{0=[], null=[null], 1=[a, a, b], 2=[ab]}
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException: element cannot be mapped to a null key
  at java.util.Objects.requireNonNull(Objects.java:228)
  at java.util.stream.Collectors.lambda$groupingBy$135(Collectors.java:907)
  at java.util.stream.Collectors$$Lambda$10/258952499.accept(Unknown Source)
  at java.util.stream.ReduceOps$3ReducingSink.accept(ReduceOps.java:169)
  at java.util.Spliterators$ArraySpliterator.forEachRemaining(Spliterators.java:948)
  at java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:512)
  at java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:502)
  at java.util.stream.ReduceOps$ReduceOp.evaluateSequential(ReduceOps.java:708)
  at java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234)
  at java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.collect(ReferencePipeline.java:499)
  at CollectGroupByNull.main(CollectGroupByNull.java:49)

Answer 5

To your 1st question, from the docs:

There are no guarantees on the type, mutability, serializability, or thread-safety of the Map or List objects returned.

Because not all Map implementations allow null keys they probably added this to reduce to the most common allowable definition of a map to get maximum flexibility when choosing a type.

To your 2nd question, you just need a supplier, wouldn't a lambda work? I'm still getting acquainted with Java 8, maybe a smarter person can add a better answer.

Answer 6

Use filter before groupingBy##

Filter out the null instances before groupingBy.

Here is an example

MyObjectlist.stream()
  .filter(p -> p.getSomeInstance() != null)
  .collect(Collectors.groupingBy(MyObject::getSomeInstance));