Just to be sure and have clarification of that at first, is the NFC of the Smartwatch 3 just an embedded tag or is it a theoretically fully functioning NFC-chip?
Hop
The smartwatch supports NFC, based on the specs here http://www.smartwatchspecifications.com/Device/smartwatch-3-swr50/, yet there is no NFC API available as of now, hopefully there will be one, I'm also looking for this functionality, planning to develop apps with this feature
I finally got my hands on one of those smart watches. This is what I found so far.
Scanning the SWR50 as a tag:
The SWR50 is identified as an NFC Forum Type 2 Tag manufactured by Broadcom. The 7-byte-UID of the watch that I tested is 2e020d00000000
. Both, the fact that I could not find any dedicated Type 2 tags from Broadcom and the many zeros in the UID, make me think that this might be a tag emulated using some NFC controller.
The tag has 122 blocks (times 4 bytes makes 488 bytes in total) containing the following data:
0: 2e 02 0d 0c 1: 00 00 00 00 2: 00 00 ff ff 3: e1 11 3c 0f 4: 00 00 00 01 5: 03 78 30 35 6: 03 31 d4 0f 7: 1f 61 6e 64 8: 72 6f 69 64 9: 2e 63 6f 6d 10: 3a 70 6b 67 11: 63 6f 6d 2e 12: 67 6f 6f 67 13: 6c 65 2e 61 14: 6e 64 72 6f 15: 69 64 2e 77 16: 65 61 72 61 17: 62 6c 65 2e 18: 61 70 70 fe 19: ff ff ff ff 20: 30 a8 db f2 21: 43 1c ff ff 22: 30 a8 db f5 23: 2a 78 ff ff 24: 14 39 2d 4d 25: f2 6a 91 40 26: ff ff ff ff 27: ff ff ff ff (remaining blocks are all filled with ff ff ff ff)
The static lock bits (block 2, bytes 2 and 3) are all set (indicates locked state).
Block 3 contains a capability container for a Type 2 tag (magic byte 0xE1
).
However, the mapping version number 1.1 (0x11
) does not comply to any of the current mapping version documents provided by the NFC Forum! The only mapping version number that is currently defined is 1.0.
Block 4 contains 3 NULL TLVs (0x00
) and the first byte of a Lock Control TLV (tag 0x01
).
The Lock Control TLV indicates that there are 48 lock bits located starting at byte position 232 (= 7 * 25 + 8). I.e. 6 bytes starting at block 58, so they are all set (0xFFFFFFFFFFFF
). Each lock bit locks 3 bytes, so they indicate that blocks 16 to 51 are locked.
Block 6 contains the start of an NDEF Message TLV (tag 0x03
, length 0x31
). The NDEF message consists of a single NDEF record (Android Application Record for app com.google.android.wearable.app):
+--------------------------------------------+ | TNF: EXTERNAL TYPE | | Type: urn:nfc:ext:android.com:pkg | +--------------------------------------------+ | Payload: com.google.android.wearable.app | +--------------------------------------------+
Block 18 contains a Terminator TLV (tag 0xFE
) indicating the last TLV block within the tag memory area.
Blocks 20 and 21 (first 2 bytes) contain the device Bluetooth address.
Blocks 22 and 23 (first 2 bytes) contain something that looks like a Bluetooth address too.
Blocks 24 and 25 contain the device serial number.
The remaining blocks are all filled with FF FF FF FF
.
Android NFC API access:
Requesting an instance of the NFC adapter fails (the getDefaultAdapter()
method returns null):
NfcManager nfcMgr = (NfcManager)mContext.getSystemService(Context.NFC_SERVICE);
NfcAdapter nfcAdapter = nfcMgr.getDefaultAdapter(); // -> null
In addition there is a log message that the device does not support NFC.
V/NFC: this device does not have NFC support
Looking at the NFC system features, none of the NFC system features are available:
PackageManager pkgMgr = mContext.getPackageManager();
boolean featureNfc = pkgMgr.hasSystemFeature("android.hardware.nfc"); // -> false
boolean featureHce = pkgMgr.hasSystemFeature("android.hardware.nfc.hce"); // -> false
Both featureNfc
and featureHce
are false
, so neither android.hardware.nfc nor android.hardware.nfc.hce are available.
So there is currently no NFC API available on the SWR50.
Firmware analysis:
So there might be support for NFC from the hardware side and the kernel side, but the user-space part of the NFC stack is missing. Though the kernel driver might just as well point to nowhere. And the firmware of the BCM43341 might be coded in a way that the NFC controller simply emulates the Type 2 tag while being inaccessible from the operating system.
There is a fully functional chip in the SmartWatch 3. It is today acting according to the spec linked by CM787 (here's a new one as the old one seems dead).
When Android Wear officially expands on the support for NFC, the SmartWatch 3 will be able to follow.
Nope. It says the NFC is for powering on or pairing on the spec sheet. Doesn't look like 3rd party developers are going to get a crack at it this time around.