If I create a Stored Procedure in SQL and call it (EXEC spStoredProcedure
) within the BEGIN/END TRANSACTION, does this other stored procedure also fall into the
@Chris, I did not know that.
When googling for more info, I came across this - you can set 'savepoints', which can be rolled back to without rolling back the whole transaction.
Could be useful in this situation.
As Chris and James mentioned, you need to be careful when dealing with nested transactions. There is a set a very good articles on the subject of transactions written by Don Peterson on SQL Server Central , I would recommend having a read of those:
Here there are:
Sounds great, thanks a bunch. I ended up doing something like this (because I'm on 05)
BEGIN TRY
BEGIN TRANSACTION
DO SOMETHING
COMMIT
END TRY
BEGIN CATCH
IF @@TRANCOUNT > 0
ROLLBACK
-- Raise an error with the details of the exception
DECLARE @ErrMsg nvarchar(4000), @ErrSeverity int
SELECT @ErrMsg = ERROR_MESSAGE(),
@ErrSeverity = ERROR_SEVERITY()
RAISERROR(@ErrMsg, @ErrSeverity, 1)
END CATCH
As Chris mentioned, you should be careful about rolling the transaction back.
Specifically this:
IF @@TRANCOUNT > 0 ROLLBACK
is not always what you want. You could do something like this
IF(@@TRANCOUNT = 1) ROLLBACK TRAN
ELSE IF(@@TRANCOUNT > 1) COMMIT TRAN
RETURN @error
This way, the calling proc can inspect the return value from the stored procedure and determine if it wants to commit anyways or continue to bubble up the error.
The reason is that 'COMMIT' will just decrement your transaction counter. Once it decrements the transaction counter to zero, then an actual commit will occur.
Yes, all nested stored procedure calls are included in the scope of the transaction. If you are using SQL Server 2005 or greater, you can use Try...Catch as well. Here is more detail on that.
Yes, everything that you do between the Begin Transaction and Commit (or Rollback) is part of the transaction.