What is the best command-line tool to clean up code?

前端 未结 6 376
情话喂你
情话喂你 2020-12-12 11:58

When I\'m writing C - code I solely use an editor and gcc. I was wondering if anyone could suggest a good and simple tool that will find unused variables, function declarati

相关标签:
6条回答
  • 2020-12-12 12:12

    How about to use a profiler and find what code is running the most, and focus in on those parts.

    Maybe gprof can help out?

    /Johan

    Edit: Or since you talked about cleanup, invert my answer above and remove the code that never executes.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-12 12:14

    splint (http://www.splint.org/) is quite excellent; I've used it on megaline codes to look for this sort of thing,

    (Updated: everybody wants to be an art director.)

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-12 12:18

    If you run gcc with -Wall, it'll catch some of the things you mention, such as unused variables (and perhaps unused functions). In terms of optimizations, I don't, though in general the compiler is smart enough to make the kinds of optimizations that matter, so I wouldn't worry too much. Just don't use horrible algorithms. ;-)

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-12 12:19

    Although I am sure that this is not a comprehensive list of static code analysis tools, here are my impressions of some different ones that I've worked with in the past. (I work mostly with C.)

    1. Splint: I often use Splint because it is available for many GNU/Linux distributions. It is relatively easy to work with; however, it tends to be overwhelming when operating under the strictest setting. Moreover, the sometimes-necessary use of annotations can clutter and obfuscate easily-readable code. Regardless, I suggest using it.

    2. Uno: Uno is definitely a promising, but it is not as rigorous as Splint (by design). Instead, it focuses on the clarity and usefulness of its warnings. For me, Uno is only useful as a supplement to Splint (to clearly point out warnings hidden among the comparatively many that Splint issues).

    3. PC-lint: I find that PC-lint is unwieldy for a proprietary program. I once used it when developing for MS-DOS and cryptic names it uses for its errors made it very difficult to use. From what I hear, there are many better products to use on MS-DOS.

    4. Pscan: (Dead hyperlink) Pscan is great for finding format string vulnerabilities! As with Uno, I suggest using it as a supplement to Splint.

    If you do not work with C, you may also want to check out: Wikipedia - List of tools for static code analysis, Inspection/Review Tools, Source/Binary Code Static Analyzers, and Source Code Security Analyzers.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-12 12:30

    As Dan Fego pointed out, GCC can catch unused variables and unused static functions. It won't normally find unused extern functions as it normally works one source file at a time.

    GCC (v4.3.2) has hundreds if not thousands of options. One that might help is '--combine' to combine source files (as long as you're not in the habit of putting the same function or variable names inside different source files).

    The option '--help' tells you more; the options '--help=optimizers' and '--help=warnings' each give you a couple hundred lines of output. The warnings include:

    -Wunused                    This switch lacks documentation
    -Wunused-function           Warn when a function is unused
    -Wunused-label              This switch lacks documentation
    -Wunused-macros             Warn about macros defined in the main file that
                                are not used
    -Wunused-parameter          Warn when a function parameter is unused
    -Wunused-value              Warn when an expression value is unused
    -Wunused-variable           Warn when a variable is unused
    

    Added: this is a script called glint that I use to sanitize my code. It is quite old so it doesn't use the '#!/bin/sh' notation for the first line and it says '$*' instead of '"$@"', both of which should be fixed, but neither needs to be fixed urgently. Note that even though GCC 4.x no longer supports the '-fwriteable-strings' option, it still supports the '-Wwrite-strings' option and that has value.

    This script demonstrates that you can get a lot of mileage out of existing tools with just a small amount of work. You can configure just about every option it uses - albeit mainly via the environment rather than the command line. Of course, you can add extra warning options to the command line; what you can't do is remove predetermined options except via the environment. But that's OK; they're chosen by default for good reasons. These days, I'd probably set 'GLINT_ANSI=-std=c99' or fix the script; I've not been using it much of late since I code fairly closely to the standard that glint enforces. (Note that the '-o /dev/null' means that you can only do one file at a time; hack to fix!)

    :   "@(#)$Id: glint.sh,v 1.5 2002/08/09 21:40:52 jleffler Exp jleffler $"
    #
    #   Use GCC as excruciatingly pedantic lint
    #   Not a complete replacement for lint -- it doesn't do inter-file checking.
    #   Now configurable via the environment.
    #   Use GLINT_EXTRA_FLAGS to set extra flags via the environment.
    #   NB: much Solaris code won't work with -undef enabled.
    
    : ${GLINT_GCC:='gcc'}
    
    : ${GLINT_ANSI='-ansi'}
    : ${GLINT_FNO_COMMON='-fno-common'}
    : ${GLINT_FSHORT_ENUMS='-fshort-enums'}
    : ${GLINT_PEDANTIC='-pedantic'}
    : ${GLINT_UNDEF='-undef'}
    : ${GLINT_W='-W'}
    : ${GLINT_WAGGREGATE_RETURN='-Waggregate-return'}
    : ${GLINT_WALL='-Wall'}
    : ${GLINT_WCAST_ALIGN='-Wcast-align'}
    : ${GLINT_WCAST_QUAL='-Wcast-qual'}
    : ${GLINT_WCONVERSION='-Wconversion'}
    : ${GLINT_WMISSING_DECLARATIONS='-Wmissing-declarations'}
    : ${GLINT_WREDUNDANT_DECLS='-Wredundant-decls'}
    : ${GLINT_WMISSING_PROTOTYPES='-Wmissing-prototypes'}
    : ${GLINT_WNESTED_EXTERNS='-Wnested-externs'}
    : ${GLINT_WPOINTER_ARITH='-Wpointer-arith'}
    : ${GLINT_WSHADOW='-Wshadow'}
    : ${GLINT_WSTRICT_PROTOTYPES='-Wstrict-prototypes'}
    : # ${GLINT_WTRADITIONAL='-Wtraditional'}
    : ${GLINT_WWRITE_STRINGS='-Wwrite-strings'}
    
    exec ${GLINT_GCC} \
        ${GLINT_ANSI} \
        ${GLINT_FNO_COMMON} \
        ${GLINT_FSHORT_ENUMS} \
        ${GLINT_PEDANTIC} \
        ${GLINT_UNDEF} \
        ${GLINT_WAGGREGATE_RETURN} \
        ${GLINT_WALL} \
        ${GLINT_WCAST_ALIGN} \
        ${GLINT_WCAST_QUAL} \
        ${GLINT_WCONVERSION} \
        ${GLINT_WMISSING_DECLARATIONS} \
        ${GLINT_WREDUNDANT_DECLS} \
        ${GLINT_WMISSING_PROTOTYPES} \
        ${GLINT_WNESTED_EXTERNS} \
        ${GLINT_WPOINTER_ARITH} \
        ${GLINT_WSHADOW} \
        ${GLINT_WSTRICT_PROTOTYPES} \
        ${GLINT_WTRADITIONAL} \
        ${GLINT_WWRITE_STRINGS} \
        ${GLINT_W} \
        ${GLINT_EXTRA_FLAGS} \
        -o /dev/null -O4 -g -c $*
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-12 12:31

    Lint is the classic tool for checking style on C programs. There's more modern incarnation of it called Splint. This Wikipedia entry has a list of static code analysis tools, some free, some commercial.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题