Object.freeze() vs const

前端 未结 5 453
感情败类
感情败类 2020-12-12 10:27

Object.freeze() seems like a transitional convenience method to move towards using const in ES6.

Are there cases where both take their place in the cod

相关标签:
5条回答
  • 2020-12-12 10:37

    const and Object.freeze are two completely different things.

    const applies to bindings ("variables"). It creates an immutable binding, i.e. you cannot assign a new value to the binding.

    Object.freeze works on values, and more specifically, object values. It makes an object immutable, i.e. you cannot change its properties.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-12 10:39

    Summary:

    const and Object.freeze() serve totally different purposes.

    • const is there for declaring a variable which has to assinged right away and can't be reassigned. variables declared by const are block scoped and not function scoped like variables declared with var
    • Object.freeze() is a method which accepts an object and returns the same object. Now the object cannot have any of its properties removed or any new properties added.

    Examples const:

    Example 1: Can't reassign const

    const foo = 5;
    
    foo = 6;

    The following code throws an error because we are trying to reassign the variable foo who was declared with the const keyword, we can't reassign it.

    Example 2: Data structures which are assigned to const can be mutated

    const object = {
      prop1: 1,
      prop2: 2 
    }
    
    object.prop1 = 5;   // object is still mutable!
    object.prop3 = 3;   // object is still mutable!
    
    console.log(object);  // object is mutated

    In this example we declare a variable using the const keyword and assign an object to it. Although we can't reassign to this variable called object, we can mutate the object itself. If we change existing properties or add new properties this will this have effect. To disable any changes to the object we need Object.freeze().

    Examples Object.freeze():

    Example 1: Can't mutate a frozen object

    object1 = {
      prop1: 1,
      prop2: 2
    }
    
    object2 = Object.freeze(object1);
    
    console.log(object1 === object2); // both objects are refer to the same instance
    
    object2.prop3 = 3; // no new property can be added, won't work
    
    delete object2.prop1; // no property can be deleted, won't work
    
    console.log(object2); // object unchanged

    In this example when we call Object.freeze() and give object1 as an argument the function returns the object which is now 'frozen'. If we compare the reference of the new object to the old object using the === operator we can observe that they refer to the same object. Also when we try to add or remove any properties we can see that this does not have any effect (will throw error in strict mode).

    Example 2: Objects with references aren't fully frozen

    const object = {
      prop1: 1,
      nestedObj: {
        nestedProp1: 1,
        nestedProp2: 2,
      } 
    }
    
    
    const frozen = Object.freeze(object);
    
    frozen.prop1 = 5; // won't have any effect
    frozen.nestedObj.nestedProp1 = 5; //will update because the nestedObject isn't frozen
    
    console.log(frozen);

    This example shows that the properties of nested objects (and other by reference data structures) are still mutable. So Object.freeze() doesn't fully 'freeze' the object when it has properties which are references (to e.g. Arrays, Objects).

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-12 10:42

    Let be simple.

    They are different. Check the comments on the code, that will explain each case.

    Const - It is block scope variable like let, which value can not reassignment, re-declared .

    That means

    {
     const val = 10;  // you can not access it outside this block, block scope variable
    
    }
    
    console.log(val); // undefined because it is block scope 
    
    const constvalue = 1;
    constvalue = 2; // will give error as we are re-assigning the value;
    const obj = { a:1 , b:2};
    
    obj.a = 3;
    obj.c = 4;
    console.log(obj); // obj = {a:3,b:2,c:4} we are not assigning the value of identifier we can 
                      // change the object properties, const applied only on value, not with properties
    obj = {x:1};     // error you are re-assigning the value of constant obj 
    obj.a = 2 ;     // you can add, delete element of object
    

    The whole understanding is that const is block scope and its value is not re-assigned.

    Object.freeze: The object root properties are unchangeable, also we can not add and delete more properties but we can reassign the whole object again.

    var x = Object.freeze({data:1,
        name:{
        firstname:"hero", lastname:"nolast"
        }
    });
    
    x.data = 12;  // the object properties can not be change but in const you can do
    x.firstname ="adasd"; // you can not add new properties to object but in const you can do
    
    x.name.firstname = "dashdjkha"; // The nested value are changeable 
    
    //The thing you can do in Object.freeze but not in const
    
    x = { a: 1};  // you can reassign the object when it is Object.freeze but const its not allowed
    

    // One thing that is similar in both is, nested object are changeable

    const obj1 = {nested :{a:10}};
    var obj2 =  Object.freeze({nested :{a:10}});
    
    obj1.nested.a = 20; // both statement works
    obj2.nested.a = 20;
    

    Thanks.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-12 10:49
    var obj = {
      a: 1,
      b: 2
    };
    Object.freeze(obj);
    obj.newField = 3; // You can't assign new field , or change current fields
    

    The above example it completely makes your object immutable.

    Lets look following example.

    const obj = {
      a: 1,
      b: 2
    };
    obj.a = 13; // You can change a field
    obj.newField = 3; // You can assign new field.
    

    It won't give any error.

    But If you try like that

    const obj = {
          a: 1,
          b: 2
        };
    obj = {
     t:4
    };
    

    It will throw an error like that "obj is read-only".

    Another use case

    const obj = {a:1};
    var obj = 3;
    

    It will throw Duplicate declaration "obj"

    Also according to mozilla docs const explanation

    The const declaration creates a read-only reference to a value. It does not mean the value it holds is immutable, solely that the variable identifier can not be reassigned.

    This examples created according to babeljs ES6 features.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-12 10:51

    In ES5 Object.freeze doesn't work on primitives, which would probably be more commonly declared using const than objects. You can freeze primitives in ES6, but then you also have support for const.

    On the other hand const used to declare objects doesn't "freeze" them, you just can't redeclare the whole object, but you can modify its keys freely. On the other hand you can redeclare frozen objects.

    Object.freeze is also shallow, so you'd need to recursively apply it on nested objects to protect them.

    var ob1 = {
       foo : 1,
        bar : {
            value : 2   
        }
    };
    Object.freeze( ob1 );
    
    const ob2 = {
       foo : 1,
        bar : {
            value : 2   
        }
    }
    
    ob1.foo = 4;  // (frozen) ob1.foo not modified
    ob2.foo = 4;  // (const) ob2.foo modified
    
    ob1.bar.value = 4;  // (frozen) modified, because ob1.bar is nested
    ob2.bar.value = 4;  // (const) modified
    
    ob1.bar = 4;  // (frozen) not modified, bar is a key of obj1
    ob2.bar = 4;  // (const) modified
    
    ob1 = {};  // (frozen) ob1 redeclared
    ob2 = {}; // (const) ob2 not redeclared
    
    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题