Strange behavior of Macro-expansion

前端 未结 3 1112
悲&欢浪女
悲&欢浪女 2020-12-12 01:47

Here\'s the code:

#include 
#include 
#define VAL1(a,b)    a*b
#define VAL2(a,b)    a/b
#define VAL3(a,b)    ++a%b
int main()
{         


        
相关标签:
3条回答
  • 2020-12-12 01:59

    In one case you have + ++ and in the other case you have ++ +. + ++ and ++ + are different streams of tokens. Macro pasting doesn't change tokenization because it's tokens that are pasted.

    If you punch your program into a C pre-processor, you'll get this out for that line:

    int result = a/d/e*b+ ++c%d;
    

    Notice that the preprocessor had to insert a space because one is mandatory between a + token and a ++ token.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-12 02:12

    I tried to compile it with GCC 4.7, and the two expressions gave the same results.

    If you want to see how macro will expand, you can use cpp, which is the C Preprossessor, and will give you the output after preprocessor expression are executed, here the output is

    int main()
    {
        int a = 1;
        int b = 2;
        int c = 3;
        int d = 3;
        int e = 5;
    
        int result = a/d/e*b+++c%d;  
        int result2 = a/d/e*b+++c%d;  
    
        printf("%d %d\n", result, result2);
    
        return 0;
    }
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-12 02:21

    If you really think it is necessary to use such macros, you'll need to use parenthesis () to avoid side-effects:

    #define VAL1(a,b)    ((a)*(b))
    #define VAL2(a,b)    ((a)/(b))
    #define VAL3(a,b)    ((++a)%(b))
    
    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题