Converting Double to DateTime?

Question

I have a .CSV file which I am reading into a C# program. In one of the columns, there is a date, but it is in the \"general\" format, so it shows up in the .CSV as a number.

Answer 1

To go from an DateTime in the "Excel Format" to a C# Date Time you can use the DateTime.FromOADate function.

In your example above:

   DateTime myDate = DateTime.FromOADate(41172);

To write it out for display in the desired format, use:

   myDate.ToString("dd/MM/yyyy");

If you are wondering where the discrepancies in Excel's date handling come from, it's supposed to be on purpose:

When Lotus 1-2-3 was first released, the program assumed that the year 1900 was a leap year even though it actually was not a leap year. This made it easier for the program to handle leap years and caused no harm to almost all date calculations in Lotus 1-2-3.

When Microsoft Multiplan and Microsoft Excel were released, they also assumed that 1900 was a leap year. This allowed Microsoft Multiplan and Microsoft Excel to use the same serial date system used by Lotus 1-2-3 and provide greater compatibility with Lotus 1-2-3. Treating 1900 as a leap year also made it easier for users to move worksheets from one program to the other.

Although it is technically possible to correct this behavior so that current versions of Microsoft Excel do not assume that 1900 is a leap year, the disadvantages of doing so outweigh the advantages.

Source: http://www.ozgrid.com/Excel/ExcelDateandTimes.htm

Answer 2

I've seen this from MSDN: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.datetime.fromoadate.aspx, but I actually think it's wrong.

The real issue is that Excel erroneously supposes that the century year (1900) is a leap year, whereas in fact it was not, but 2000 WAS!

To check this out, try formatting a cell in Excel as Date and then enter 1 and it gives 1 Jan 1900. Now enter 59 and it gives 28 Feb 1900. 60 gives 29 Feb 1900 (not a real date) and then 61 gives 01 March 1900.

So...

switch (days)
{
   case < 1:
     // Not valid. Do whatever...
   break;
   case < 59:
     DateTime date = new DateTime(1900, 1, 1).AddDays(days);
   break;
   default:
     // Knock off the extra days caused by 29 Feb 1900 and 29 Feb 2000
     DateTime date = new DateTime(1900, 1, 1).AddDays(days-2);
   break;
}

Answer 3

EDIT: As noted in comments and other answers, DateTime.FromOADate is a much better approach. I'll remove this answer if it's ever unaccepted. (But, there are still platforms like .NET Core where FromOADate is not supported so it is still useful for people using these platforms.)

I suspect you want:

DateTime date = new DateTime(1900, 1, 1).AddDays(days - 2);

(See other answers for why you need to subtract 2.)

Answer 4

The date format used by Excel is old, but is still supported by the DateTime.FromOADate function, which you can use to convert this number. It is defined as

number of days before or after the base date, midnight, 30 December 1899

Answer 5

In case you are looking for FromOADate in .Net Core it is not there.

I dissembled the implementation .Net Framework and created an extension method.

        public static DateTime FromOADate(this double date)
        {
            return new DateTime(DoubleDateToTicks(date), DateTimeKind.Unspecified);
        }

        internal static long DoubleDateToTicks(double value)
        {
            if (value >= 2958466.0 || value <= -657435.0)
                throw new ArgumentException("Not a valid value");
            long num1 = (long)(value * 86400000.0 + (value >= 0.0 ? 0.5 : -0.5));
            if (num1 < 0L)
                num1 -= num1 % 86400000L * 2L;
            long num2 = num1 + 59926435200000L;
            if (num2 < 0L || num2 >= 315537897600000L)
                throw new ArgumentException("Not a valid value");
            return num2 * 10000L;
        }

Still need to test it.