.NET & ASP vs PHP [closed]

Answer 1

Have a look at Phalanger. It is PHP running on the .Net Framework and has been making some huge strides in the last few months. Definitly worth investigating when coming from PHP.

Phalanger

Answer 2

I stopped using PHP before PHP5 was out so I my views on PHP are very outdated I suppose. Nevertheless, what I liked about C# (ASP.NET) was that it forced me into acquiring better programming practices (OO in particular). PHP4 was not object oriented. Maybe the later versions of PHP are different. The greatest obstacle I encountered when shifting from PHP to ASP.NET was understanding OO. If objects are not second nature to your programming style, you're likely to find out that your ASP.NET learning curve is going to be much shallower than it was with PHP.

Answer 3

Here's a reason why you should keep using PHP:

http://www.slideshare.net/eplawless/exception-safety-and-garbage-collection-and-some-other-stuff

Answer 4

I'd say it depends on your background and how much money you have to throw around too. ASP.net has some great features but you may not even need them depending on your project. The tools are expensive, the hosting is expensive.

PHP is great because you get a lot for free, but there are trade offs.

Personally I like .NET better because thats what I started off with, I feel like I can do more with less, but thats a personal preference. I'm sure some vet php developers feel the exact same way too.

Answer 5

Used:

asp.net vs php site:stackoverflow.com

in Google search and got:

ASP.NET vs. PHP

The use of PHP vs ASP.net

PHP MVC (symfony/Zend) vs ASP MVC vs Spring MVC vs Ruby on Rails?

Career with PHP or with ASP.NET?

Answer 6

I've come from a background in Perl/CGI, Classic ASP, and ASP.NET. I decided to take up PHP to see why there is such a tremendous following. I feel like I've taken a step backwards in the language scale and would rather code in .NET or Perl.

I think Jeff Atwood would up-mod me on this.