This is a follow-up to this question - see that for context.
This question concerns a couple of special cases of the linked question - namely how sorting in MongoDB
Note: This answer is based on MongoDB 3.2.4.
It is worthwhile to discover the use of explain() in MongoDB. The explain() output of a query (e.g. db.collection.explain().find(...)
) allows you to check which index is used in a query, and using db.collection.explain('executionStats') will also show you whether the query succeeds or fails due to in-memory SORT
limitation.
$in
A $in
query can be thought of as a series of equality queries. For example, {a: {$in: [1,3,5]}}
could be thought of as {a:1}, {a:3}, {a:5}
. MongoDB will sort the $in
array before proceeding with the query, so that {$in: [3,5,1]}
is no different to {$in: [1,3,5]}
.
Let's assume the collection has an index of
{a:1, b:1}
Sorting by a
db.coll.find({a: {$in: [1,3,5]}}).sort({a:1})
MongoDB will be able to use the {a:1,b:1}
index, since this query can be thought of as a union of {a:1}, {a:3}, {a:5}
queries. Sorting by {a:1}
allows the use of index prefix, so MongoDB does not need to perform an in-memory sort.
The same situation also applies to the query:
db.coll.find({a: {$in: [1,3,5]} ,b:{$gte:1, $lt:2}}).sort({a:1})
since sort({a:1})
also uses the index prefix (a
in this case), an in-memory SORT
stage is therefore not required.
Sorting by b
This is a more interesting case compared to sorting by a
. For example:
db.coll.find({a: {$in: [1,3,5]}}).sort({b:1})
The explain()
output of this query will have a stage called SORT_MERGE
. Remember that the find()
portion of the query can be thought of as {a:1}, {a:3}, {a:5}
.
The query db.coll.find({a:1}).sort({b:1})
does not need to have an in-memory SORT
stage due to the nature of the {a:1,b:1}
index: that is, MongoDB can simply walk the (sorted) index and return documents sorted by b
after satisfying the equality parameter on a
. E.g., for each a
, there are many b
which are already sorted by b
due to the index.
Using $in
, the overall query can be thought of as:
db.coll.find({a:1}).sort({b:1})
db.coll.find({a:3}).sort({b:1})
db.coll.find({a:5}).sort({b:1})
b
. The query does not need an in-memory sort stage because the individual query results are already sorted by b
. MongoDB just need to merge the (already sorted) sub-query results into a single result.Similarly, the query
db.coll.find({a: {$in: [1,3,5]} ,b:{$gte:1, $lt:2}}).sort({b:1})
also uses a SORT_MERGE
stage and is very similar to the query above. The difference is that the individual queries output documents based on a range of b
(instead of every b
) for each a
(which will be sorted by b
due to the index {a:1,b:1}
). Hence, the query does not need an in-memory sort stage.
$or
For an $or
query to use an index, every clause in the $or expression must have an index associated with it. If this requirement is satisfied, it is possible for the query to employ a SORT_MERGE
stage just like an $in
query. For example:
db.coll.explain().find({$or:[{a:1},{a:3},{a:5}]}).sort({b:1})
will have an almost identical query plan, index use, and SORT_MERGE
stage as in the $in
example above. Essentially, the query can be thought as:
db.coll.find({a:1}).sort({b:1})
db.coll.find({a:3}).sort({b:1})
db.coll.find({a:5}).sort({b:1})
b
.just like the $in
example before.
However, this query:
db.coll.explain().find({$or:[{a:1},{b:1}]}).sort({b:1})
cannot use any index (since we do not have the {b:1}
index). This query will result in a collection scan, and consequently will have an in-memory sort stage since no index is used.
If, however, we create the index {b:1}
, the query will proceed like:
db.coll.find({a:1}).sort({b:1})
db.coll.find({b:1}).sort({b:1})
b
(which is already sorted at both sub-queries, due to the indexes {a:1,b:1}
and {b:1}
).and MongoDB will combine the results of {a:1}
and {b:1}
queries and perform a merge on the results. The merging process is linear time, e.g. O(n)
.
In conclusion, in a $or
query, every term must have an index, including the sort()
stage. Otherwise, MongoDB will will have to perform an in-memory sort.