If I want to do a bitwise equality test between two __m128i
variables, am I required to use an SSE instruction or can I use ==
? If not, which SSE i
Although using _mm_movemask_epi8
is one solution, if you have a processor with SSE4.1 I think a better solution is to use an instruction which sets the zero or carry flag in the FLAGS register. This saves a test or cmp instruction.
To do this you could do this:
if(_mm_test_all_ones(_mm_cmpeq_epi8(v1,v2))) {
//v0 == v1
}
Edit: as Paul R pointed out _mm_test_all_ones
generates two instructions: pcmpeqd
and ptest
. With _mm_cmpeq_epi8
that's three instructions total. Here's a better solution which only uses two instructions in total:
__m128i neq = _mm_xor_si128(v1,v2);
if(_mm_test_all_zeros(neq,neq)) {
//v0 == v1
}
This generates
pxor %xmm1, %xmm0
ptest %xmm0, %xmm0
Consider using an SSE4.1 instruction ptest:
if(_mm_testc_si128(v0, v1)) {if equal}
else {if not}
ptest
computes the bitwise AND of 128 bits (representing integer data) in a and mask, and return 1 if the result is zero, otherwise return 0.
You can use a compare and then extract a mask from the comparison result:
__m128i vcmp = _mm_cmpeq_epi8(v0, v1); // PCMPEQB
uint16_t vmask = _mm_movemask_epi8(vcmp); // PMOVMSKB
if (vmask == 0xffff)
{
// v0 == v1
}
This works with SSE2 and later.
As noted by @Zboson, if you have SSE 4.1 then you can do it like this, which may be slightly more efficient, as it's two SSE instructions and then a test on a flag (ZF):
__m128i vcmp = _mm_xor_si128(v0, v1); // PXOR
if (_mm_testz_si128(vcmp, vcmp)) // PTEST (requires SSE 4.1)
{
// v0 == v1
}
FWIW I just benchmarked both of these implementations on a Haswell Core i7 using clang to compile the test harness and the timing results were very similar - the SSE4 implementation appears to be very slightly faster but it's hard to measure the difference.