How do I “flatten” a list of lists in perl 6?

Question

Let\'s say I want all permutations of 2 letters out of a, b and c.

I can do:

my @perm = .combinations(2)».permutations;
say @perm;
# [((         


        

Answer 1

my @perm = <a b c>.combinations(2)».permutations;
dd [ @perm.map(*.Slip) ]
# OUTPUT«[("a", "b"), ("b", "a"), ("a", "c"), ("c", "a"), ("b", "c"), ("c", "b")]␤»

However, you may be better of to destructure the LoL when you use it later in the program. A map on a long list can take a jolly long time.

Answer 2

See also "a better way to accomplish what I (OP) wanted".

See also "Some possible solutions" answer to "How can I completely flatten a Perl 6 list (of lists (of lists) … )" question.

Add a subscript

my \perm = <a b c>.combinations(2)».permutations;
say perm;       # (((a b) (b a)) ((a c) (c a)) ((b c) (c b)))
say perm[*];    # (((a b) (b a)) ((a c) (c a)) ((b c) (c b)))
say perm[*;*];  # ((a b) (b a) (a c) (c a) (b c) (c b))
say perm[*;*;*] # (a b b a a c c a b c c b)

Notes

I used a non-sigil'd variable because I think it's a bit clearer what's going on for those who don't know Perl 6.

I didn't append the subscript to the original expression but I could have:

my \perm = <a b c>.combinations(2)».permutations[*;*];
say perm;       # ((a b) (b a) (a c) (c a) (b c) (c b))

Answer 3

Ultimately, you are building your list the wrong way to begin with. You can slip your permutations into the outer list like this.

<a b c>.combinations(2).map(|*.permutations);

Which yields the following list

((a b) (b a) (a c) (c a) (b c) (c b)) 

According to the Bench module, this is about 300% faster than doing

<a b c>.combinations(2).map(*.permutations)[*;*]

Answer 4

By inserting slips as appropriate, eg via

<a b c>.combinations(2).map(*.permutations.Slip).Array

or

[ slip .permutations for <a b c>.combinations(2) ]

Invoking .Array in the first example is unnecessary if you're fine with a Seq, and can be replaced with calls to .list or .cache (supplied by PositionalBindFailover) if mutability is not needed.

In the second example, the prefix | operator could be used instead of the slip sub.