Linq To Sql vs Entity Framework Performance

Question

I have been searching for recent performance benchmarks that compare L2S and EF and couldnt find any that tested calling stored procedures using the released version of EF.

Answer 1

This looks to be a pretty measurement of performance between LINQ to SQL and Entity Framework.

http://toomanylayers.blogspot.com/2009/01/entity-framework-and-linq-to-sql.html

Answer 2

I think you should test it in a somewhat different way, in order to distinguish startup costs vs. execution costs. The Entity Framework, in particular, has substantial startup costs resulting from the need to compile database views (although you can do this in advance). Likewise, LINQ has a notion of a compiled query, which would be appropriate if executing a query multiple times.

For many applications, query execution costs will be more important than startup costs. For some, the opposite may be true. Since the performance characteristics of these are different, I think it's important to distinguish them. In particular, averaging startup costs into the average cost of a query executed repeatedly is misleading.

Answer 3

I did a couple of test asp.net pages trying to see which performs better. My test was:

Delete 10,000 records Insert 10,000 records Edit 10,000 records Databind the 10,000 records to a GridView and display on the page

I was expecting LinqToSQL to be faster but doing the above LinqToSQL takes nearly 2 minutes while LinqToEntities takes less than 20 seconds.

At least for this test it seems LinqToEntities is faster. My results seem to match yours as well.

I didn't try Inserting/Editing/Deleting/Displaying more than 1 table joined together though.

I'm interested in finding out more... or if my test isn't a valid type of test I'd be interested in seeing some real tests.