java comparator, how to sort by integer?

后端 未结 6 968
一整个雨季
一整个雨季 2020-12-08 09:36

Im trying to learn comparator in java and I have found this great example online, my question is how would this code be changed so that the pet names are ordered by age and

相关标签:
6条回答
  • 2020-12-08 09:55
    public class DogAgeComparator implements Comparator<Dog> {
        public int compare(Dog o1, Dog o2) {
            return Integer.compare(o1.getAge(), o2.getId());
        }
    }
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-08 09:55

    From Java 8 you can use :

    Comparator.comparingInt(Dog::getDogAge).reversed();
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-08 10:00

    One simple way is

    Comparator<Dog> ageAscendingComp = ...;
    Comparator<Dog> ageDescendingComp = Collections.reverseOrder(ageAscendingComp);
    // then call the sort method
    

    On a side note, Dog should really not implement Comparator. It means you have to do strange things like

    Collections.sort(myList, new Dog("Rex", 4));
    // ^-- why is a new dog being made? What are we even sorting by?!
    Collections.sort(myList, myList.get(0));
    // ^-- or perhaps more confusingly
    

    Rather you should make Compartors as separate classes.

    eg.

    public class DogAgeComparator implments Comparator<Dog> {
        public int compareTo(Dog d1, Dog d2) {
            return d1.getAge() - d2.getAge();
        }
    }
    

    This has the added benefit that you can use the name of the class to say how the Comparator will sort the list. eg.

    Collections.sort(someDogs, new DogNameComparator());
    // now in name ascending order
    
    Collections.sort(someDogs, Collections.reverseOrder(new DogAgeComparator()));
    // now in age descending order
    

    You should also not not have Dog implement Comparable. The Comparable interface is used to denote that there is some inherent and natural way to order these objects (such as for numbers and strings). Now this is not the case for Dog objects as sometimes you may wish to sort by age and sometimes you may wish to sort by name.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-08 10:03

    Simply changing

    public int compare(Dog d, Dog d1) {
      return d.age - d1.age;
    }
    

    to

    public int compare(Dog d, Dog d1) {
      return d1.age - d.age;
    }
    

    should sort them in the reverse order of age if that is what you are looking for.

    Update:

    @Arian is right in his comments, one of the accepted ways of declaring a comparator for a dog would be where you declare it as a public static final field in the class itself.

    class Dog implements Comparable<Dog> {
        private String name;
        private int age;
    
        public static final Comparator<Dog> DESCENDING_COMPARATOR = new Comparator<Dog>() {
            // Overriding the compare method to sort the age
            public int compare(Dog d, Dog d1) {
                return d.age - d1.age;
            }
        };
    
        Dog(String n, int a) {
            name = n;
            age = a;
        }
    
        public String getDogName() {
            return name;
        }
    
        public int getDogAge() {
            return age;
        }
    
        // Overriding the compareTo method
        public int compareTo(Dog d) {
            return (this.name).compareTo(d.name);
        }
    
    }
    

    You could then use it any where in your code where you would like to compare dogs as follows:

    // Sorts the array list using comparator
    Collections.sort(list, Dog.DESCENDING_COMPARATOR);
    

    Another important thing to remember when implementing Comparable is that it is important that compareTo performs consistently with equals. Although it is not required, failing to do so could result in strange behaviour on some collections such as some implementations of Sets. See this post for more information on sound principles of implementing compareTo.

    Update 2: Chris is right, this code is susceptible to overflows for large negative values of age. The correct way to implement this in Java 7 and up would be Integer.compare(d.age, d1.age) instead of d.age - d1.age.

    Update 3: With Java 8, your Comparator could be written a lot more succinctly as:

    public static final Comparator<Dog> DESCENDING_COMPARATOR = 
        Comparator.comparing(Dog::getDogAge).reversed();
    

    The syntax for Collections.sort stays the same, but compare can be written as

    public int compare(Dog d, Dog d1) {
        return DESCENDING_COMPARATOR.compare(d, d1);
    }
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-08 10:16

    If you have access to the Java 8 Comparable API, Comparable.comparingToInt() may be of use. (See Java 8 Comparable Documentation).

    For example, a Comparator<Dog> to sort Dog instances descending by age could be created with the following:

    Comparable.comparingToInt(Dog::getDogAge).reversed();

    The function take a lambda mapping T to Integer, and creates an ascending comparator. The chained function .reversed() turns the ascending comparator into a descending comparator.

    Note: while this may not be useful for most versions of Android out there, I came across this question while searching for similar information for a non-Android Java application. I thought it might be useful to others in the same spot to see what I ended up settling on.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-08 10:21

    Just replace:

    return d.age - d1.age;
    

    By:

    return ((Integer)d.age).compareTo(d1.age);
    

    Or invert to reverse the list:

    return ((Integer)d1.age).compareTo(d.age);
    

    EDIT:

    Fixed the "memory problem".
    Indeed, the better solution is change the age field in the Dog class to Integer, because there many benefits, like the null possibility...

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题