If a global variable is initialized to 0, will it go to BSS?

后端 未结 3 1640
逝去的感伤
逝去的感伤 2020-12-08 07:35

All the initialized global/static variables will go to initialized data section. All the uninitialized global/static variables will go to uninitialed data secti

相关标签:
3条回答
  • 2020-12-08 08:12

    The behavior is dependent upon the C implementation. It may end up in either .data or .bss, and to increase changes that it does not end up in .data taking redundant space up, it's better not to explicitly initialize it to 0, since it will be set to 0 anyway if the object is of static duration.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-08 08:16

    It's easy enough to test for a specific compiler:

    $ cat bss.c
    int global_no_value;
    int global_initialized = 0;
    
    int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
        return 0;
    }
    $ make bss
    cc     bss.c   -o bss
    $ readelf -s bss | grep global_
        32: 0000000000400420     0 FUNC    LOCAL  DEFAULT   13 __do_global_dtors_aux
        40: 0000000000400570     0 FUNC    LOCAL  DEFAULT   13 __do_global_ctors_aux
        55: 0000000000601028     4 OBJECT  GLOBAL DEFAULT   25 global_initialized
        60: 000000000060102c     4 OBJECT  GLOBAL DEFAULT   25 global_no_value
    

    We're looking for the location of 0000000000601028 and 000000000060102c:

    $ readelf -S bss
    There are 30 section headers, starting at offset 0x1170:
    
    Section Headers:
      [Nr] Name              Type             Address           Offset
           Size              EntSize          Flags  Link  Info  Align
    ...
      [24] .data             PROGBITS         0000000000601008  00001008
           0000000000000010  0000000000000000  WA       0     0     8
      [25] .bss              NOBITS           0000000000601018  00001018
           0000000000000018  0000000000000000  WA       0     0     8
    

    It looks like both values are stored in the .bss section on my system: gcc version 4.5.2 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4).

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-08 08:19

    Compiler is free to put such variable into bss as well as into data. For example, GCC has a special option controlling such behavior:

    -fno-zero-initialized-in-bss

    If the target supports a BSS section, GCC by default puts variables that are initialized to zero into BSS. This can save space in the resulting code. This option turns off this behavior because some programs explicitly rely on variables going to the data section. E.g., so that the resulting executable can find the beginning of that section and/or make assumptions based on that.

    The default is -fzero-initialized-in-bss.

    Tried with the following example (test.c file):

    int put_me_somewhere = 0;
    
    int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { return 0; }
    

    Compiling with no options (implicitly -fzero-initialized-in-bss):

    $ touch test.c && make test && objdump -x test | grep put_me_somewhere
    cc     test.c   -o test
    0000000000601028 g     O .bss   0000000000000004              put_me_somewhere
    

    Compiling with -fno-zero-initialized-in-bss option:

    $ touch test.c && make test CFLAGS=-fno-zero-initialized-in-bss && objdump -x test | grep put_me_somewhere
    cc -fno-zero-initialized-in-bss    test.c   -o test
    0000000000601018 g     O .data  0000000000000004              put_me_somewhere
    
    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题