How do I unlock a SQLite database?

前端 未结 30 1396
栀梦
栀梦 2020-11-22 15:56
sqlite> DELETE FROM mails WHERE (`id` = 71);
SQL error: database is locked

How do I unlock the database so this will work?

相关标签:
30条回答
  • 2020-11-22 16:44

    I ran into this same problem on Mac OS X 10.5.7 running Python scripts from a terminal session. Even though I had stopped the scripts and the terminal window was sitting at the command prompt, it would give this error the next time it ran. The solution was to close the terminal window and then open it up again. Doesn't make sense to me, but it worked.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-22 16:44

    If you're trying to unlock the Chrome database to view it with SQLite, then just shut down Chrome.

    Windows

    %userprofile%\Local Settings\Application Data\Google\Chrome\User Data\Default\Web Data
    
    or
    
    %userprofile%\Local Settings\Application Data\Google\Chrome\User Data\Default\Chrome Web Data
    

    Mac

    ~/Library/Application Support/Google/Chrome/Default/Web Data
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-22 16:46

    This error can be thrown if the file is in a remote folder, like a shared folder. I changed the database to a local directory and it worked perfectly.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-22 16:47

    Deleting the -journal file sounds like a terrible idea. It's there to allow sqlite to roll back the database to a consistent state after a crash. If you delete it while the database is in an inconsistent state, then you're left with a corrupted database. Citing a page from the sqlite site:

    If a crash or power loss does occur and a hot journal is left on the disk, it is essential that the original database file and the hot journal remain on disk with their original names until the database file is opened by another SQLite process and rolled back. [...]

    We suspect that a common failure mode for SQLite recovery happens like this: A power failure occurs. After power is restored, a well-meaning user or system administrator begins looking around on the disk for damage. They see their database file named "important.data". This file is perhaps familiar to them. But after the crash, there is also a hot journal named "important.data-journal". The user then deletes the hot journal, thinking that they are helping to cleanup the system. We know of no way to prevent this other than user education.

    The rollback is supposed to happen automatically the next time the database is opened, but it will fail if the process can't lock the database. As others have said, one possible reason for this is that another process currently has it open. Another possibility is a stale NFS lock, if the database is on an NFS volume. In that case, a workaround is to replace the database file with a fresh copy that isn't locked on the NFS server (mv database.db original.db; cp original.db database.db). Note that the sqlite FAQ recommends caution regarding concurrent access to databases on NFS volumes, because of buggy implementations of NFS file locking.

    I can't explain why deleting a -journal file would let you lock a database that you couldn't before. Is that reproducible?

    By the way, the presence of a -journal file doesn't necessarily mean that there was a crash or that there are changes to be rolled back. Sqlite has a few different journal modes, and in PERSIST or TRUNCATE modes it leaves the -journal file in place always, and changes the contents to indicate whether or not there are partial transactions to roll back.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-22 16:48

    lsof command on my Linux environment helped me to figure it out that a process was hanging keeping the file open.
    Killed the process and problem was solved.

    0 讨论(0)
  • I found the documentation of the various states of locking in SQLite to be very helpful. Michael, if you can perform reads but can't perform writes to the database, that means that a process has gotten a RESERVED lock on your database but hasn't executed the write yet. If you're using SQLite3, there's a new lock called PENDING where no more processes are allowed to connect but existing connections can sill perform reads, so if this is the issue you should look at that instead.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题