Unexpected ConvertTo-Json results? Answer: it has a default -Depth of 2

后端 未结 2 1567
暖寄归人
暖寄归人 2020-11-22 15:33

Why do I get unexpected ConvertTo-Json results, why do I get values like System.Collections.Hashtable and/or why does a round-trip ($Json | ConvertFrom-Js

相关标签:
2条回答
  • 2020-11-22 16:11

    Answer

    ConvertTo-Json has a -Depth parameter:

    Specifies how many levels of contained objects are included in the JSON representation.
    The default value is 2.

    Example

    To do a full round-trip with a JSON file you need to increase the -Depth for the ConvertTo-Json cmdlet:

    $Json | ConvertFrom-Json | ConvertTo-Json -Depth 9
    

    TL;DR

    Probably because ConvertTo-Json terminates branches that are deeper than the default -Depth (2) with a (.Net) full type name, programmers assume a bug or a cmdlet limitation and do not read the help or about.
    Personally, I think a string with a simple ellipsis (three dots: …) at the end of the cut off branch, would have a clearer meaning (see also: Github issue: 8381)

    Why?

    This issue often ends up in another discussion as well: Why is the depth limited at all?

    Some objects have circular references, meaning that a child object could refer to a parent (or one of its grandparents) causing a infinitive loop if it would be serialized to JSON.

    Take for example the following hash table with a parent property that refers to the object itself:

    $Test = @{Guid = New-Guid}
    $Test.Parent = $Test
    

    If you execute: $Test | ConvertTo-Json it will conveniently stop at a depth level of 2 by default:

    {
        "Guid":  "a274d017-5188-4d91-b960-023c06159dcc",
        "Parent":  {
                       "Guid":  "a274d017-5188-4d91-b960-023c06159dcc",
                       "Parent":  {
                                      "Guid":  "a274d017-5188-4d91-b960-023c06159dcc",
                                      "Parent":  "System.Collections.Hashtable"
                                  }
                   }
    }
    

    This is why it is not a good idea to automatically set the -Depth to a large amount.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-22 16:13

    Update: PowerShell 7.1 introduced a warning when truncation occurs. While better than the previous quiet truncation, the solution suggested below seems much preferable to me.


    Your helpful question and answer clearly illustrate how much of a pain point the current default ConvertTo-Json behavior is.

    As for the justification of the behavior:

    While -Depth can be useful to intentionally truncate an input object tree whose full depth you don't need, -Depth defaulting to 2 and quietly truncating the output amounts to quiet de-facto failure of the serialization from the unsuspecting user's perspective - failure that may not be discovered until later.

    The seemingly arbitrary and quiet truncation is surprising to most users, and having to account for it in every ConvertTo-Json call is an unnecessary burden.

    I've created this GitHub issue to request changing the current behavior, specifically as follows:

    • Ignore -Depth for [pscustomobject] object graphs (a hierarchy of what are conceptually DTOs (data-transfer objects, "property bags"), such as returned from Convert*From*-Json), specifically.

      • It does make sense to have an automatic depth limit for arbitrary .NET types, as they can be object graphs of excessive depths and may even contain circular references; e.g., Get-ChildItem | ConvertTo-Json can get quickly out of hand, with -Depth values as low as 4.

      • Note that nested collections, including hashtables, are not themselves subject to the depth limit only their (scalar) elements.

      • This distinction between DTOs and other types is, in fact, employed by PowerShell itself behind the scenes, namely in the context of serialization for remoting and background jobs.

    • Use of -Depth is then only needed to intentionally truncate the input object tree at the specified depth or serialize to a deeper level (if needed if to depth greater than the internal maximum-depth limit, 100)

    Make your voice heard there, if you'd like to see this change happen (or disagree).

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题