Round a double in Java

Question

I have found this great solution for rounding:

static Double round(Double d, int precise) {
    BigDecimal bigDecimal = new BigDecimal(d);
    bigDecimal = b         


        

Answer 1

Rounding a double resp Double in itself does not make much sense, as a double datatype cannot be rounded (easily, or at all?).

What you are doing is:

1. Take a Double d as input and a int precise number of digits behind the seperator.
2. Create a BigDecimal from that d.
3. Round the BigDecimal correctly.
4. Return the double value of that BigDecimal, which has no rounding applied to it anymore.

You can go two ways:

1. You can return a BigDecimal that represents the rounded double, and later decide what you do with it.
2. You can return a String representing the rounded BigDecimal.

Either of those ways will make sense.

Answer 2

You have to replace

BigDecimal bigDecimal = new BigDecimal(d);

with

BigDecimal bigDecimal = BigDecimal.valueOf(d);

and you will get the expected results:

2.66
1.66

Explanation from Java API:

BigDecimal.valueOf(double val) - uses the double's canonical string representation provided by the Double.toString() method. This is preferred way to convert a double (or float) into a BigDecimal.

new BigDecimal(double val) - uses the exact decimal representation of the double's binary floating-point value and thus results of this constructor can be somewhat unpredictable.

Answer 3

This test case ends up pretty self-explanatory:

public static void main (String[] args) throws java.lang.Exception
{
    System.out.println("Rounded: " + round(2.655d,2)); // -> 2.65
    System.out.println("Rounded: " + round(1.655d,2)); // -> 1.66
}

public static Double round(Double d, int precise)
{       
    BigDecimal bigDecimal = new BigDecimal(d);
    System.out.println("Before round: " + bigDecimal.toPlainString());
    bigDecimal = bigDecimal.setScale(precise, RoundingMode.HALF_UP);
    System.out.println("After round: " + bigDecimal.toPlainString());
    return bigDecimal.doubleValue();
}

Output:

Before round: 2.654999999999999804600747665972448885440826416015625
After round: 2.65
Rounded: 2.65

Before round: 1.6550000000000000266453525910037569701671600341796875
After round: 1.66
Rounded: 1.66

A dirty hack to fix it would be to round in two steps:

static Double round(Double d, int precise)
{
    BigDecimal bigDecimal = new BigDecimal(d);
    System.out.println("Before round: " + bigDecimal.toPlainString());
    bigDecimal = bigDecimal.setScale(15, RoundingMode.HALF_UP);
    System.out.println("Hack round: " + bigDecimal.toPlainString());
    bigDecimal = bigDecimal.setScale(precise, RoundingMode.HALF_UP);
    System.out.println("After round: " + bigDecimal.toPlainString());
    return bigDecimal.doubleValue();
}

Here, 15 is a bit under the maximum number of digits a double can represent in base 10. Output:

Before round: 2.654999999999999804600747665972448885440826416015625
Hack round: 2.655000000000000
After round: 2.66
Rounded: 2.66

Before round: 1.6550000000000000266453525910037569701671600341796875
Hack round: 1.655000000000000
After round: 1.66
Rounded: 1.66

Answer 4

Decimal numbers can't be represented exactly in double.

So 2.655 ends up being this: 2.65499999999999980460074766597

whereas 1.655 ends up being this: 1.655000000000000026645352591

Answer 5

You may try to change your program like this:-

static Double round(Double d, int precise) 
{
BigDecimal bigDecimal = BigDecimal.valueOf(d);
bigDecimal = bigDecimal.setScale(precise, RoundingMode.HALF_UP);
return bigDecimal.doubleValue();
}

Sample Ideone

Success  time: 0.07 memory: 381184 signal:0
Rounded: 2.66
Rounded: 1.66

Success  time: 0.07 memory: 381248 signal:0
Rounded: 2.66
Rounded: 1.66

Reason why you are getting the expected result with BigDecimal.valueOf and not with new BigDecimal, in the words of Joachim Sauer:

BigDecimal.valueOf(double) will use the canonical String representation of the double value passed in to instantiate the BigDecimal object. In other words: The value of the BigDecimal object will be what you see when you do System.out.println(d).

If you use new BigDecimal(d) however, then the BigDecimal will try to represent the double value as accurately as possible. This will usually result in a lot more digits being stored than you want.

Hence resulting in some confusion which you are watching in your program.

From the Java Doc:

BigDecimal.valueOf(double val) - Translates a double into a BigDecimal, using the double's canonical string representation provided by the Double.toString(double) method.

new BigDecimal(double val) -

Translates a double into a BigDecimal which is the exact decimal representation of the double's binary floating-point value. The scale of the returned BigDecimal is the smallest value such that (10scale × val) is an integer. Notes:

• The results of this constructor can be somewhat unpredictable. One might assume that writing new BigDecimal(0.1) in Java creates a
  BigDecimal which is exactly equal to 0.1 (an unscaled value of 1,
  with a scale of 1), but it is actually equal to 0.1000000000000000055511151231257827021181583404541015625. This is because 0.1 cannot be represented exactly as a double (or, for that
  matter, as a binary fraction of any finite length). Thus, the value
  that is being passed in to the constructor is not exactly equal to 0.1, appearances notwithstanding.
• The String constructor, on the other hand, is perfectly predictable: writing new BigDecimal("0.1") creates a BigDecimal which is exactly equal to 0.1, as one would expect. Therefore, it is generally recommended that the String constructor be used in preference to this one.
• When a double must be used as a source for a BigDecimal, note that this constructor provides an exact conversion; it does not give the
  same result as converting the double to a String using the
  Double.toString(double) method and then using the BigDecimal(String)
  constructor. To get that result, use the static valueOf(double)
  method.

Answer 6

As said in API

1. The results of this constructor can be somewhat unpredictable. One might assume that writing new BigDecimal(0.1) in Java creates a BigDecimal which is exactly equal to 0.1 (an unscaled value of 1, with a scale of 1), but it is actually equal to 0.1000000000000000055511151231257827021181583404541015625. This is because 0.1 cannot be represented exactly as a double (or, for that matter, as a binary fraction of any finite length). Thus, the value that is being passed in to the constructor is not exactly equal to 0.1, appearances notwithstanding.

2. The String constructor, on the other hand, is perfectly predictable: writing new BigDecimal("0.1") creates a BigDecimal which is exactly equal to 0.1, as one would expect. Therefore, it is generally recommended that the String constructor be used in preference to this one.

3. When a double must be used as a source for a BigDecimal, note that this constructor provides an exact conversion; it does not give the same result as converting the double to a String using the Double.toString(double) method and then using the BigDecimal(String) constructor. To get that result, use the static valueOf(double) method.

It's because of cannot represent double value exactly. So you have to use BigDecimal bigDecimal = BigDecimal.valueOf(d); instead of BigDecimal bigDecimal = new BigDecimal(d);