JSF Service Layer

Question

I am not sure whether my approach with the MVC environment in JSF is the best way to go. Since I am trying to get the most out of JSF I would like to know how my Service Lay

Answer 1

The service layer (the business model) should be designed around the main entity (the data model). E.g. UserService for User, ProductService for Product, OrderService for Order, etc. You should absolutely not have one huge service class or so. That's extreme tight coupling.

As to the service layer API itself, Java EE 6 offers EJB 3.1 as service layer API. In the dark J2EE ages, long time ago when EJB 2.0 was terrible to develop with, Spring was more often been used as service layer API. Some still use it nowadays, but since Java EE 6 has incorporated all the nice lessons learnt from Spring, it has become superfluous. Note that EJB (and JPA) is not available in barebones servletcontainers such as Tomcat. You'd need to install for example OpenEJB on top of it (or just upgrade to TomEE).

Regardless of the service layer API choice, best would be to keep your JSF backing bean (action)listener methods as slick as possible by performing the business job entirely in the service layer. Note that the service layer should by itself not have any JSF dependencies. So any (in)direct imports of javax.faces.* in the service layer code indicates bad design. You should keep the particular code lines in the backing bean (it's usually code which adds a faces message depending on the service call result). This way the service layer is reuseable for other front ends, such as JAX-RS or even plain servlets.

You should understand that the main advantage of the service layer in a Java EE application is the availability of container managed transactions. One service method call on a @Stateless EJB counts effectively as a single DB transaction. So if an exception occurs during one of any DAO operations using @PersistenceContext EntityManager which is invoked by the service method call, then a complete rollback will be triggered. This way you end up with a clean DB state instead of a dirty DB state because for example the first DB manipulation query succeeded, but the second not.

See also:

• Creating master-detail pages for entities, how to link them and which bean scope to choose
• When is it necessary or convenient to use Spring or EJB3 or all of them together?
• JSF Controller, Service and DAO

Answer 2

The 1:1 ratio between services and model entities maybe not bad if you have few entities in your app. But if it is a big app, there would be too much services.

The number of services depends upon the use cases of the app you are designing. Once you have identified them in the analysis phase, you must group them in several groups according to their functionality. Each group of use cases will be a Service, and each use case will be a method in that service. Each Service can manage several model entities (and you have to inject in it the DAOs it needs to perform its functionality). Usually the uses cases of a Service manage model entities inter-realationated in the class diagram of the model. The Services might follow the good practice of "max cohesion / min coupling".

The ratio between DAOs and model entities is 1:1. Each DAO perform CRUD operations and queries of its entity. If a method needs to query 2 relationated entities, put it in the more suitable DAO depending on the business concepts.

In the JSF presentation layer I neither have a 1:1 ratio between pages and controllers, that would be too much controllers. I group into one contrller all the pages needed to perform the use cases of each service. So the ratio 1:1 is between controllers and services, injecting each service in the controller whose pages perform its use cases.

Of course, these are general principles. You may have some particular cases in the app that broke them, but they are few.

You might not have too much services and controllers, but not too few neither because then they would have too much logic and fields. You must acchieve a compromise.