Is there an easy way to check whether two data frames are different copies or views of the same underlying data that doesn\'t involve manipulations? I\'m trying to get a gri
I've elaborated on this example with pandas 1.0.1. There's not only a boolean _is_view
attribute, but also _is_copy
which can be None
or a reference to the original DataFrame:
df = pd.DataFrame([[1,2,3,4],[5,6,7,8]], index = ['row1','row2'],
columns = ['a','b','c','d'])
df2 = df.iloc[0:2, :]
df3 = df.loc[df['a'] == 1, :]
# df is neither copy nor view
df._is_view, df._is_copy
Out[1]: (False, None)
# df2 is a view AND a copy
df2._is_view, df2._is_copy
Out[2]: (True, <weakref at 0x00000236635C2228; to 'DataFrame' at 0x00000236635DAA58>)
# df3 is not a view, but a copy
df3._is_view, df3._is_copy
Out[3]: (False, <weakref at 0x00000236635C2228; to 'DataFrame' at 0x00000236635DAA58>)
So checking these two attributes should tell you not only if you're dealing with a view or not, but also if you have a copy or an "original" DataFrame.
See also this thread for a discussion explaining why you can't always predict whether your code will return a view or not.
You might trace the memory your pandas/python environment is consuming, and, on the assumption that a copy will utilise more memory than a view, be able to decide one way or another.
I believe there are libraries out there that will present the memory usage within the python environment itself - e.g. Heapy/Guppy.
There ought to be a metric you can apply that takes a baseline picture of memory usage prior to creating the object under inspection, then another picture afterwards. Comparison of the two memory maps (assuming nothing else has been created and we can isolate the change is due to the new object) should provide an idea of whether a view or copy has been produced.
We'd need to get an idea of the different memory profiles of each type of implementation, but some experimentation should yield results.
Answers from HYRY and Marius in comments!
One can check either by:
testing equivalence of the values.base
attribute rather than the values
attribute, as in:
df.values.base is df2.values.base
instead of df.values is df2.values
.
or using the (admittedly internal) _is_view
attribute (df2._is_view
is True
).
Thanks everyone!