Some places state 2GB period. Some places state it depends up the number of nodes.
As per the documentation, this is 4GB. Section 11.5
http://erlang.org/faq/mnesia.html
Quite large if your question is "what's the storage capacity of an mnesia database made up of a huge number of disc_only_copies
tables" - you're largely limited by available disk space.
An easier question to answer is what's the maximum capacity of a single mnesia table of different types. ram_copies
tables are limited by available memory. disc_copies
tables are limited by their dets
backend (Hakan Mattsson on Mnesia) - this limit is 4Gb of data at the moment.
So the simple answer is that simple disc_copies
table can store up to 4Gb of data before they run into problems. (Mnesia doesn't actually crash if you exceed the on-disk size limit - the ram_copies portion of the table continues running, so you can repair this by deleting data or making other arrangements at runtime)
However if you consider other mnesia features, then the answer is more complicated.
local_content
table,
then it can have different contents
on each node in the mnesia cluster,
so the capacity of the table is
4Gb * <number of nodes>
4Gb * <number of fragments>
. (Sadly if you fragment your table, you then have to modify your table access code to use mnesia:activity/4
instead of mnesia:write
and friends, but if you plan this in advance it's managable)TL;DR: the storage capacity of a Mnesia database is limited only* by available RAM.
* Assuming you use table types ram_copies
or disc_copies
. Also, if you store a lot of data in a disc_copies
table, it needs to be read from disk at startup, which might increase startup time beyond what's acceptable.
This answer contradicts the two existing answers when it comes to tables of type disc_copies
. Let me first get a few general points out of the way:
ram_copies
is only limited by available RAM (except if you're on a 32-bit machine). Data is stored in an ETS table.disc_only_copies
is stored in a Dets table. Dets tables are limited to 2 GB, because of limits in the file format.disc_copies
is stored both in RAM and on disk, so it is limited by available RAM - and perhaps something else?I'm going to try to show below that there is no specific limit imposed by Mnesia on the size of a disc_copies
table. Note however that many Erlang programmers believe that disc_copies
tables are limited to 2 GB. That is stated in the accepted answer to this question, which at the time of writing outscores this answer by a factor of 7.
It is commonly believed that disc_copies
tables are backed by Dets tables. As far as I can tell, this was the case until Erlang/OTP R7B-4 (released on 30th September 2001). From the README:
-- mnesia -----------------------------------------------------------------
OTP-3712 - Speed/load improvements disc_copies tables are not
implemented with dets anymore.
Look at the diff for more details, in particular mnesia_lib.erl
and mnesia_loader.erl
.
archelaus's answer draws from http://erlang.org/~hakan/mnesia_consumption.txt, which explains that disc_copies
tables reside in ets and dets tables. However, looking at the index for the directory, we see that this document is dated 1999:
[TXT] mnesia_consumption.txt 26-Oct-1999 10:57 10k
It makes sense that it would say this, as it was written two years before the change.
Ray Boosen's answer draws from the Erlang FAQ:
11.5 How much data can be stored in Mnesia?
Dets uses 32 bit integers for file offsets, so the largest possible mnesia table (for now) is 4Gb.
In practice your machine will slow to a crawl way before you reach this limit.
The FAQ has been saying that since at least January 2001 (see the earliest copy in the Wayback Machine). That means that this FAQ entry dates from before the switch to disk_log, and hasn't been updated for a long time. (Anyway, the Dets table size limit is 2 GB, not 4 GB.) I submitted a pull request for the FAQ.
The Learn You Some Erlang chapter on Mnesia says:
ram_copies
This option makes it so all data is stored exclusively in ETS, so memory only. Memory should be limited to a theoretical 4GB (and practically around 3GB) for virtual machines compiled on 32 bits, but this limit is pushed further away on 64 bits virtual machines, assuming there is more than 4GB of memory available.disc_only_copies
This option means that the data is stored only in DETS. Disc only, and as such the storage is limited to DETS' 2GB limit.disc_copies
This option means that the data is stored both in ETS and on disk, so both memory and the hard disk. disc_copies tables are not limited by DETS limits, as Mnesia uses a complex system of transaction logs and checkpoints that allow to create a disk-based backup of the table in memory.
I'm not sure when this was written, but the text above exists in the earliest Wayback Machine copy, dated April 2012.
In a post on erlang-questions titled "beating mnesia to death (was RE: Using 4Gb of ram with Erlang VM)", dated 7th November 2005, Ulf Wiger writes:
On a 16 GB machine, you can:
run 6 million simultaneous processes (through use of erlang:hibernate, I was actually able to run 20 million - spawn time: 6.3 us, message passing time: 5.3 us, and I had 1.8 GB to spare.)
populate mnesia with at least 12 GB of data, but think through how you want to represent it, since the 64-bit word size blows things up a bit.
keep a 10 GB+ disc_copy table in mnesia. The load times and log dump cost seem acceptable (10 minutes to load, dumping takes a while but runs in the background quite nicely.)
The confusion seems to stem from missing or out-dated information from official sources:
LYSE seems to be the first "authoritative" source that mentions disc_copies
tables not being subject to the Dets table size limit.