As I\'m reading in the PowerShell user guide, one of the core PowerShell concepts is that commands accept and return objects instead of text. So for example, runnin
@($output).Count
does not always produce correct results.
I used the ($output | Measure).Count
method.
I found this with VMware Get-VmQuestion cmdlet:
$output = Get-VmQuestion -VM vm1
@($output).Count
The answer it gave is one, whereas
$output
produced no output (the correct answer was 0 as produced with the Measure
method).
This only seemed to be the case with 0 and 1. Anything above 1 was correct with limited testing.
in my exchange the cmd-let you presented did not work, the answer was null, so I had to make a little correction and worked fine for me:
@(get-transportservice | get-messagetrackinglog -Resultsize unlimited -Start "MM/DD/AAAA HH:MM" -End "MM/DD/AAAA HH:MM" -recipients "user@domain.com" | where {$_.Event
ID -eq "DELIVER"}).count
This will get you count:
get-alias | measure
You can work with the result as with object:
$m = get-alias | measure
$m.Count
And if you would like to have aliases in some variable also, you can use Tee-Object:
$m = get-alias | tee -Variable aliases | measure
$m.Count
$aliases
Some more info on Measure-Object cmdlet is on Technet.
Do not confuse it with Measure-Command cmdlet which is for time measuring. (again on Technet)
Just use parenthesis and 'count'. This applies to Powershell v3
(get-alias).count
As short as @jumbo's answer is :-) you can do it even more tersely.
This just returns the Count
property of the array returned by the antecedent sub-expression:
@(Get-Alias).Count
A couple points to note:
You can put an arbitrarily complex expression in place of Get-Alias
, for example:
@(Get-Process | ? { $_.ProcessName -eq "svchost" }).Count
The initial at-sign (@) is necessary for a robust solution. As long as the answer is two or greater you will get an equivalent answer with or without the @, but when the answer is zero or one you will get no output unless you have the @ sign! (It forces the Count
property to exist by forcing the output to be an array.)
2012.01.30 Update
The above is true for PowerShell V2. One of the new features of PowerShell V3 is that you do have a Count
property even for singletons, so the at-sign becomes unimportant for this scenario.