Suppose my models.py is like so:
class Character(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=255)
is_the_chosen_one = models.BooleanField()
Instead of using custom model cleaning/saving, I created a custom field overriding the pre_save
method on django.db.models.BooleanField
. Instead of raising an error if another field was True
, I made all other fields False
if it was True
. Also instead of raising an error if the field was False
and no other field was True
, I saved it the field as True
fields.py
from django.db.models import BooleanField
class UniqueBooleanField(BooleanField):
def pre_save(self, model_instance, add):
objects = model_instance.__class__.objects
# If True then set all others as False
if getattr(model_instance, self.attname):
objects.update(**{self.attname: False})
# If no true object exists that isnt saved model, save as True
elif not objects.exclude(id=model_instance.id)\
.filter(**{self.attname: True}):
return True
return getattr(model_instance, self.attname)
# To use with South
from south.modelsinspector import add_introspection_rules
add_introspection_rules([], ["^project\.apps\.fields\.UniqueBooleanField"])
models.py
from django.db import models
from project.apps.fields import UniqueBooleanField
class UniqueBooleanModel(models.Model):
unique_boolean = UniqueBooleanField()
def __unicode__(self):
return str(self.unique_boolean)
Do I get points for answering my question?
problem was it was finding itself in the loop, fixed by:
# is this the testimonial image, if so, unselect other images
if self.testimonial_image is True:
others = Photograph.objects.filter(project=self.project).filter(testimonial_image=True)
pdb.set_trace()
for o in others:
if o != self: ### important line
o.testimonial_image = False
o.save()
Trying to make ends meet with the answers here, I find that some of them address the same issue successfully and each one is suitable in different situations:
I would choose:
@semente: Respects the constraint at the database, model and admin form levels while it overrides Django ORM the least possible. Moreover it can probably be used inside a through
table of a ManyToManyField
in aunique_together
situation. (I will check it and report)
class MyModel(models.Model):
is_the_chosen_one = models.NullBooleanField(default=None, unique=True)
def save(self, *args, **kwargs):
if self.is_the_chosen_one is False:
self.is_the_chosen_one = None
super(MyModel, self).save(*args, **kwargs)
@Ellis Percival: Hits the database only one extra time and accepts the current entry as the chosen one. Clean and elegant.
from django.db import transaction
class Character(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=255)
is_the_chosen_one = models.BooleanField()
def save(self, *args, **kwargs):
if not self.is_the_chosen_one:
# The use of return is explained in the comments
return super(Character, self).save(*args, **kwargs)
with transaction.atomic():
Character.objects.filter(
is_the_chosen_one=True).update(is_the_chosen_one=False)
# The use of return is explained in the comments
return super(Character, self).save(*args, **kwargs)
Other solutions not suitable for my case but viable:
@nemocorp is overriding the clean
method to perform a validation. However, it does not report back which model is "the one" and this is not user friendly. Despite that, it is a very nice approach especially if someone does not intend to be as aggressive as @Flyte.
@saul.shanabrook and @Thierry J. would create a custom field which would either change any other "is_the_one" entry to False
or raise a ValidationError
. I am just reluctant to impement new features to my Django installation unless it is absoletuly necessary.
@daigorocub: Uses Django signals. I find it a unique approach and gives a hint of how to use Django Signals. However I am not sure whether this is a -strictly speaking- "proper" use of signals since I cannot consider this procedure as part of a "decoupled application".
2020 update to make things less complicated for beginners:
class Character(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=255)
is_the_chosen_one = models.BooleanField(blank=False, null=False, default=False)
def save(self):
if self.is_the_chosen_one == True:
items = Character.objects.filter(is_the_chosen_one = True)
for x in items:
x.is_the_chosen_one = False
x.save()
super().save()
Of course, if you want the unique boolean to be False, you would just swap every instance of True with False and vice versa.
It is simpler to add this kind of constraint to your model
after Django version 2.2. You can directly use UniqueConstraint.condition
. Django Docs
Just override your models class Meta
like this:
class Meta:
constraints = [
UniqueConstraint(fields=['is_the_chosen_one'], condition=Q(is_the_chosen_one=True), name='unique_is_the_chosen_one')
]
I tried some of these solutions, and ended up with another one, just for the sake of code shortness (don't have to override forms or save method). For this to work, the field can't be unique in it's definition but the signal makes sure that happens.
# making default_number True unique
@receiver(post_save, sender=Character)
def unique_is_the_chosen_one(sender, instance, **kwargs):
if instance.is_the_chosen_one:
Character.objects.all().exclude(pk=instance.pk).update(is_the_chosen_one=False)