@UniqueConstraint and @Column(unique = true) in hibernate annotation

前端 未结 4 1819
别跟我提以往
别跟我提以往 2020-12-07 10:04

What is difference between @UniqueConstraint and @Column(unique = true)?

For example:

@Table(
   name = \"product_s         


        
相关标签:
4条回答
  • 2020-12-07 10:44

    From the Java EE documentation:

    public abstract boolean unique
    

    (Optional) Whether the property is a unique key. This is a shortcut for the UniqueConstraint annotation at the table level and is useful for when the unique key constraint is only a single field. This constraint applies in addition to any constraint entailed by primary key mapping and to constraints specified at the table level.

    See doc

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-07 10:57

    In addition to Boaz's answer ....

    @UniqueConstraint allows you to name the constraint, while @Column(unique = true) generates a random name (e.g. UK_3u5h7y36qqa13y3mauc5xxayq).

    Sometimes it can be helpful to know what table a constraint is associated with. E.g.:

    @Table(
       name = "product_serial_group_mask", 
       uniqueConstraints = {
          @UniqueConstraint(
              columnNames = {"mask", "group"},
              name="uk_product_serial_group_mask"
          )
       }
    )
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-07 11:01

    In addition to @Boaz's and @vegemite4me's answers....

    By implementing ImplicitNamingStrategy you may create rules for automatically naming the constraints. Note you add your naming strategy to the metadataBuilder during Hibernate's initialization:

    metadataBuilder.applyImplicitNamingStrategy(new MyImplicitNamingStrategy());
    

    It works for @UniqueConstraint, but not for @Column(unique = true), which always generates a random name (e.g. UK_3u5h7y36qqa13y3mauc5xxayq).

    There is a bug report to solve this issue, so if you can, please vote there to have this implemented. Here: https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-11586

    Thanks.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-07 11:04

    As said before, @Column(unique = true) is a shortcut to UniqueConstraint when it is only a single field.

    From the example you gave, there is a huge difference between both.

    @Column(unique = true)
    @ManyToOne(optional = false, fetch = FetchType.EAGER)
    private ProductSerialMask mask;
    
    @Column(unique = true)
    @ManyToOne(optional = false, fetch = FetchType.EAGER)
    private Group group;
    

    This code implies that both mask and group have to be unique, but separately. That means that if, for example, you have a record with a mask.id = 1 and tries to insert another record with mask.id = 1, you'll get an error, because that column should have unique values. The same aplies for group.

    On the other hand,

    @Table(
       name = "product_serial_group_mask", 
       uniqueConstraints = {@UniqueConstraint(columnNames = {"mask", "group"})}
    )
    

    Implies that the values of mask + group combined should be unique. That means you can have, for example, a record with mask.id = 1 and group.id = 1, and if you try to insert another record with mask.id = 1 and group.id = 2, it'll be inserted successfully, whereas in the first case it wouldn't.

    If you'd like to have both mask and group to be unique separately and to that at class level, you'd have to write the code as following:

    @Table(
            name = "product_serial_group_mask",
            uniqueConstraints = {
                    @UniqueConstraint(columnNames = "mask"),
                    @UniqueConstraint(columnNames = "group")
            }
    )
    

    This has the same effect as the first code block.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题