What is the difference between objectForKey
and valueForKey
?
I looked both up in the documentation and they seemed the same to me.
Here's a great reason to use objectForKey:
wherever possible instead of valueForKey:
- valueForKey:
with an unknown key will throw NSUnknownKeyException
saying "this class is not key value coding-compliant for the key ".
When you do valueForKey:
you need to give it an NSString, whereas objectForKey:
can take any NSObject subclass as a key. This is because for Key-Value Coding, the keys are always strings.
In fact, the documentation states that even when you give valueForKey:
an NSString, it will invoke objectForKey:
anyway unless the string starts with an @
, in which case it invokes [super valueForKey:]
, which may call valueForUndefinedKey:
which may raise an exception.
objectForKey:
is an NSDictionary
method. An NSDictionary
is a collection class similar to an NSArray
, except instead of using indexes, it uses keys to differentiate between items. A key is an arbitrary string you provide. No two objects can have the same key (just as no two objects in an NSArray
can have the same index).
valueForKey:
is a KVC method. It works with ANY class. valueForKey:
allows you to access a property using a string for its name. So for instance, if I have an Account
class with a property accountNumber
, I can do the following:
NSNumber *anAccountNumber = [NSNumber numberWithInt:12345];
Account *newAccount = [[Account alloc] init];
[newAccount setAccountNumber:anAccountNUmber];
NSNumber *anotherAccountNumber = [newAccount accountNumber];
Using KVC, I can access the property dynamically:
NSNumber *anAccountNumber = [NSNumber numberWithInt:12345];
Account *newAccount = [[Account alloc] init];
[newAccount setValue:anAccountNumber forKey:@"accountNumber"];
NSNumber *anotherAccountNumber = [newAccount valueForKey:@"accountNumber"];
Those are equivalent sets of statements.
I know you're thinking: wow, but sarcastically. KVC doesn't look all that useful. In fact, it looks "wordy". But when you want to change things at runtime, you can do lots of cool things that are much more difficult in other languages (but this is beyond the scope of your question).
If you want to learn more about KVC, there are many tutorials if you Google especially at Scott Stevenson's blog. You can also check out the NSKeyValueCoding Protocol Reference.
Hope that helps.
As said, the objectForKey:
datatype is :(id)aKey
whereas the valueForKey:
datatype is :(NSString *)key
.
For example:
NSDictionary *dict = [NSDictionary dictionaryWithObjectsAndKeys:[NSArray arrayWithObject:@"123"],[NSNumber numberWithInteger:5], nil];
NSLog(@"objectForKey : --- %@",[dict objectForKey:[NSNumber numberWithInteger:5]]);
//This will work fine and prints ( 123 )
NSLog(@"valueForKey : --- %@",[dict valueForKey:[NSNumber numberWithInteger:5]]);
//it gives warning "Incompatible pointer types sending 'NSNumber *' to parameter of type 'NSString *'" ---- This will crash on runtime.
So, valueForKey:
will take only a string value and is a KVC method, whereas objectForKey:
will take any type of object.
The value in objectForKey
will be accessed by the same kind of object.
I'll try to provide a comprehensive answer here. Much of the points appear in other answers, but I found each answer incomplete, and some incorrect.
First and foremost, objectForKey:
is an NSDictionary
method, while valueForKey:
is a KVC protocol method required of any KVC complaint class - including NSDictionary.
Furthermore, as @dreamlax wrote, documentation hints that NSDictionary
implements its valueForKey:
method USING its objectForKey:
implementation. In other words - [NSDictionary valueForKey:]
calls on [NSDictionary objectForKey:]
.
This implies, that valueForKey:
can never be faster than objectForKey:
(on the same input key) although thorough testing I've done imply about 5% to 15% difference, over billions of random access to a huge NSDictionary. In normal situations - the difference is negligible.
Next: KVC protocol only works with NSString *
keys, hence valueForKey:
will only accept an NSString *
(or subclass) as key, whilst NSDictionary
can work with other kinds of objects as keys - so that the "lower level" objectForKey:
accepts any copy-able (NSCopying protocol compliant) object as key.
Last, NSDictionary's
implementation of valueForKey:
deviates from the standard behavior defined in KVC's documentation, and will NOT emit a NSUnknownKeyException
for a key it can't find - unless this is a "special" key - one that begins with '@' - which usually means an "aggregation" function key (e.g. @"@sum, @"@avg"
). Instead, it will simply return a nil when a key is not found in the NSDictionary - behaving the same as objectForKey:
Following is some test code to demonstrate and prove my notes.
- (void) dictionaryAccess {
NSLog(@"Value for Z:%@", [@{@"X":@(10), @"Y":@(20)} valueForKey:@"Z"]); // prints "Value for Z:(null)"
uint32_t testItemsCount = 1000000;
// create huge dictionary of numbers
NSMutableDictionary *d = [NSMutableDictionary dictionaryWithCapacity:testItemsCount];
for (long i=0; i<testItemsCount; ++i) {
// make new random key value pair:
NSString *key = [NSString stringWithFormat:@"K_%u",arc4random_uniform(testItemsCount)];
NSNumber *value = @(arc4random_uniform(testItemsCount));
[d setObject:value forKey:key];
}
// create huge set of random keys for testing.
NSMutableArray *keys = [NSMutableArray arrayWithCapacity:testItemsCount];
for (long i=0; i<testItemsCount; ++i) {
NSString *key = [NSString stringWithFormat:@"K_%u",arc4random_uniform(testItemsCount)];
[keys addObject:key];
}
NSDictionary *dict = [d copy];
NSTimeInterval vtotal = 0.0, ototal = 0.0;
NSDate *start;
NSTimeInterval elapsed;
for (int i = 0; i<10; i++) {
start = [NSDate date];
for (NSString *key in keys) {
id value = [dict valueForKey:key];
}
elapsed = [[NSDate date] timeIntervalSinceDate:start];
vtotal+=elapsed;
NSLog (@"reading %lu values off dictionary via valueForKey took: %10.4f seconds", keys.count, elapsed);
start = [NSDate date];
for (NSString *key in keys) {
id obj = [dict objectForKey:key];
}
elapsed = [[NSDate date] timeIntervalSinceDate:start];
ototal+=elapsed;
NSLog (@"reading %lu objects off dictionary via objectForKey took: %10.4f seconds", keys.count, elapsed);
}
NSString *slower = (vtotal > ototal) ? @"valueForKey" : @"objectForKey";
NSString *faster = (vtotal > ototal) ? @"objectForKey" : @"valueForKey";
NSLog (@"%@ takes %3.1f percent longer then %@", slower, 100.0 * ABS(vtotal-ototal) / MAX(ototal,vtotal), faster);
}