I am wondering if this is possible. My code looks like this:
indexStop = find(firstinSeq(x,4) ~= ...
littledataPassed(y:length(littledataPas
If you absolutely have to use multiple variables, structure dynamic fieldnames using () notation would be handy. If you enter the following:
>> n = 1;
>> data.(sprintf('msgLength%u', n)) = [1 2 3 4];
>> n = 2;
>> data.(sprintf('msgLength%u', n)) = [5 6 7 8];
You'll get a structure with two fields:
>> data
data =
msgLength1: [1 2 3 4]
msgLength2: [5 6 7 8]
Despite this, I second gnovice's suggestion of using an array to store data instead of several variables. You could simply add another dimension to msgLength
so line 7 becomes:
msgLength(n,countmsgLength(n),:)= [firstinSeq(x,:) [0 0 0 0 0 0]];
It's almost always better to use arrays or cell arrays to store data than to create a bunch of variables named a1
, a2
, a3
, etc. For example, you can initialize msgLength
as a cell array with n
elements:
msgLength = cell(1,n);
And you can access cells of msgLength
using curly braces:
msgLength{n} = ... %# Assign something to cell n
Your variable countmsgLength
can just be a regular numeric array, since it appears to only store n
values. You would just have to change the square brackets to parentheses (i.e. [n]
to (n)
).
However, if you really want to create n
separate variables, you will likely end up using the EVAL function. This question and this question show some examples of how to create variables names using the value of another variable.