Most efficient way to convert an HTMLCollection to an Array

Question

Is there a more efficient way to convert an HTMLCollection to an Array, other than iterating through the contents of said collection and manually pushing each item into an a

Answer 1

var arr = Array.prototype.slice.call( htmlCollection )

will have the same effect using "native" code.

Edit

Since this gets a lot of views, note (per @oriol's comment) that the following more concise expression is effectively equivalent:

var arr = [].slice.call(htmlCollection);

But note per @JussiR's comment, that unlike the "verbose" form, it does create an empty, unused, and indeed unusable array instance in the process. What compilers do about this is outside the programmer's ken.

Edit

Since ECMAScript 2015 (ES 6) there is also Array.from:

var arr = Array.from(htmlCollection);

Edit

ECMAScript 2015 also provides the spread operator, which is functionally equivalent to Array.from (although note that Array.from supports a mapping function as the second argument).

var arr = [...htmlCollection];

I've confirmed that both of the above work on NodeList.

A performance comparison for the mentioned methods: http://jsben.ch/h2IFA

Answer 2

To convert array-like to array in efficient way we can make use of the jQuery makeArray :

makeArray: Convert an array-like object into a true JavaScript array.

Usage:

var domArray = jQuery.makeArray(htmlCollection);

---

A little extra:

If you do not want to keep reference to the array object (most of the time HTMLCollections are dynamically changes so its better to copy them into another array, This example pay close attention to performance:

var domDataLength = domData.length //Better performance, no need to calculate every iteration the domArray length
var resultArray = new Array(domDataLength) // Since we know the length its improves the performance to declare the result array from the beginning.

for (var i = 0 ; i < domDataLength ; i++) {
    resultArray[i] = domArray[i]; //Since we already declared the resultArray we can not make use of the more expensive push method.
}

What is array-like?

HTMLCollection is an "array-like" object, the array-like objects are similar to array's object but missing a lot of its functionally definition:

Array-like objects look like arrays. They have various numbered elements and a length property. But that’s where the similarity stops. Array-like objects do not have any of Array’s functions, and for-in loops don’t even work!

Answer 3

This works in all browsers including earlier IE versions.

var arr = [];
[].push.apply(arr, htmlCollection);

Since jsperf is still down at the moment, here is a jsfiddle that compares the performance of different methods. https://jsfiddle.net/qw9qf48j/

Answer 4

not sure if this is the most efficient, but a concise ES6 syntax might be:

let arry = [...htmlCollection] 

---

Edit: Another one, from Chris_F comment:

let arry = Array.from(htmlCollection)

Answer 5

This is my personal solution, based on the information here (this thread):

var Divs = new Array();    
var Elemns = document.getElementsByClassName("divisao");
    try {
        Divs = Elemns.prototype.slice.call(Elemns);
    } catch(e) {
        Divs = $A(Elemns);
    }

Where $A was described by Gareth Davis in his post:

function $A(iterable) {
  if (!iterable) return [];
  if ('toArray' in Object(iterable)) return iterable.toArray();
  var length = iterable.length || 0, results = new Array(length);
  while (length--) results[length] = iterable[length];
  return results;
}

If browser supports the best way, ok, otherwise will use the cross browser.

Answer 6

For a cross browser implementation I'd sugguest you look at prototype.js $A function

copyed from 1.6.1:

function $A(iterable) {
  if (!iterable) return [];
  if ('toArray' in Object(iterable)) return iterable.toArray();
  var length = iterable.length || 0, results = new Array(length);
  while (length--) results[length] = iterable[length];
  return results;
}

It doesn't use Array.prototype.slice probably because it isn't available on every browser. I'm afraid the performance is pretty bad as there a the fall back is a javascript loop over the iterable.